Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Oct 9;23(1):351.
doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02987-x.

The effectiveness of walking exercise on the bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a single blind randomized clinical trial study

Gholamreza Rezamand  1 , Farahnaz Joukar  1 , Ehsan Amini-Salehi  1 , Hamed Delam  2 , Reza Zare  2 , Alireza Samadi  1 , Sara Mavadati  3 , Soheil Hassanipour  1 , Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei  4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The effectiveness of walking exercise on the bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a single blind randomized clinical trial study

Gholamreza Rezamand et al. BMC Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Background and aim: Bowel preparation is a crucial factor affecting the diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy, and few randomized control trials evaluated enhancement in bowel preparation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of walking exercises on bowel preparation before a colonoscopy procedure.

Methods: The present study is a single-blind randomized controlled trial involving 262 patients scheduled for colonoscopy procedures. These patients were randomly assigned to two groups: an intervention group (n = 131) and a control group (n = 131). In the intervention group, participants followed a predetermined plan that included the consumption of specific liquids and foods, bisacodyl pills, polyethylene glycol powder, and a regimen of walking exercises in preparation for their colonoscopy. Conversely, individuals in the control group followed the same regimen but were not instructed to engage in walking exercises. On the day of the colonoscopy, both groups were assessed for their level of physical activity using a foot counter. Additionally, an experienced gastroenterologist evaluated and compared the bowel preparation between the two groups using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).

Results: The number of footsteps recorded in the two groups exhibited a significant difference (P < 0.001). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups in terms of mean BBPS scores (6.26 ± 1.9 vs. 6.29 ± 1.9, P = 0.416), individuals who took more than 6900 steps had significantly higher BBPS scores compared to those with fewer than 6900 footsteps (6.62 ± 1.8 vs. 5.92 ± 1.9, P = 0.003).In the univariate analysis, BBPS was found to be significantly associated with individuals under the age of 50 (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.30-4.61, P = 0.006) and smoking status (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.17-0.94, P = 0.043). In the multivariate analysis, the relationship between BBPS and age below 50 and smoking remained significant (OR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.30-4.70, P = 0.005, and OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16-0.93, P = 0.034, respectively).

Conclusion: A higher number of footsteps taken especially more than 6900 can significantly enhance bowel preparation; however, walking exercise as an intervention before colonoscopy is not significantly associated with BBPS. Also, older people and smokers seem to have fewer benefits from walking exercises for bowel preparation.

Trial registration: ISRCTN32724024 (Registration date:22/08/2018).

Keywords: Bowel enhancement; Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Gastrointestinal cancer; Randomized control trial; Walking exercise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort flowchart of study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS) in two groups of intervention (Blue bar) and control (green bar)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary of study setting and results
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Bray F, Ren JS, Masuyer E, Ferlay J. Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(5):1133–45. - PubMed
    1. Van Leersum N, Janssen-Heijnen M, Wouters M, Rutten H, Coebergh JW, Tollenaar R, Lemmens V. Increasing prevalence of comorbidity in patients with colorectal cancer in the South of the Netherlands 1995–2010. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(9):2157–63. - PubMed
    1. Maringe C, Mangtani P, Rachet B, Leon DA, Coleman MP, dos Santos Silva I. Cancer incidence in south asian migrants to England, 1986–2004: unraveling ethnic from socioeconomic differentials. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(8):1886–94. - PubMed
    1. Keivanlou M-H, Amini-Salehi E, Hassanipour S, Mahapatro A, Raghuma N, Joukar F, Letafatkar N, Habibi A, Norouzi N, Aleali MS. Association between smoking and colorectal cancer in Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office (EMRO): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi J Gastroenterology: Official J Saudi Gastroenterol Association. 2023;29(4):204. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abdifard E, Amini S, Bab S, Masroor N, Khachian A, Heidari M. Incidence trends of colorectal cancer in Iran during 2000–2009: a population-based study. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016;30:382–2. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources