Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 6:9:e44320.
doi: 10.2196/44320.

Effects of Web-Based and Mobile Self-Care Support in Addition to Standard Care in Patients After Radical Prostatectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

Effects of Web-Based and Mobile Self-Care Support in Addition to Standard Care in Patients After Radical Prostatectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial

Camilla Wennerberg et al. JMIR Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer is a common form of cancer that is often treated with radical prostatectomy, which can leave patients with urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Self-care (pelvic floor muscle exercises and physical activity) is recommended to reduce the side effects. As more and more men are living in the aftermath of treatment, effective rehabilitation support is warranted. Digital self-care support has the potential to improve patient outcomes, but it has rarely been evaluated longitudinally in randomized controlled trials. Therefore, we developed and evaluated the effects of digital self-care support (electronic Patient Activation in Treatment at Home [ePATH]) on prostate-specific symptoms.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of web-based and mobile self-care support on urinary continence, sexual function, and self-care, compared with standard care, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after radical prostatectomy.

Methods: A multicenter randomized controlled trial with 2 study arms was conducted, with the longitudinal effects of additional digital self-care support (ePATH) compared with those of standard care alone. ePATH was designed based on the self-determination theory to strengthen patients' activation in self-care through nurse-assisted individualized modules. Men planned for radical prostatectomy at 3 county hospitals in southern Sweden were included offline and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. The effects of ePATH were evaluated for 1 year after surgery using self-assessed questionnaires. Linear mixed models and ordinal regression analyses were performed.

Results: This study included 170 men (85 in each group) from January 2018 to December 2019. The participants in the intervention and control groups did not differ in their demographic characteristics. In the intervention group, 64% (53/83) of the participants used ePATH, but the use declined over time. The linear mixed model showed no substantial differences between the groups in urinary continence (β=-5.60; P=.09; 95% CI -12.15 to -0.96) or sexual function (β=-.12; P=.97; 95% CI -7.05 to -6.81). Participants in the intervention and control groups did not differ in physical activity (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI 0.71-1.89; P=.57) or pelvic floor muscle exercises (odds ratio 1.51, 95% CI 0.86-2.66; P=.15).

Conclusions: ePATH did not affect postoperative side effects or self-care but reflected how this support may work in typical clinical conditions. To complement standard rehabilitation, digital self-care support must be adapted to the context and individual preferences for use and effect.

Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN18055968; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18055968.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/11625.

Keywords: eHealth; linear mixed model; mHealth; mobile health; pelvic exercise; physical activity; prostate cancer; prostatic neoplasms; radical prostatectomy; randomized controlled trial; self-care; sexual dysfunction; telemedicine; urinary incontinence; web-based.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) flow diagram. The intervention group and control group allocated 85 men each. Five men withdrew from participation because of other treatment or without giving a reason. No answers were received from 19 men, who were considered lost to follow-up.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Urinary continence and sexual function (mean) over time in the intervention and control groups. BL: baseline; MO: month.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davis M, Egan J, Marhamati S, Galfano A, Kowalczyk KJ. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted robotic prostatectomy: past, present, and future. Urol Clin North Am. 2021 Feb;48(1):11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2020.09.012.S0094-0143(20)30077-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strączyńska A, Weber-Rajek M, Strojek K, Piekorz Z, Styczyńska H, Goch A, Radzimińska A. The impact of pelvic floor muscle training on urinary incontinence in men after Radical Prostatectomy (RP) - a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Nov 12;14:1997–2005. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S228222. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/31814714 228222 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker H, Wellman S, Lavender V. Functional quality-of-life outcomes reported by men treated for localized prostate cancer: a systematic literature review. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016 Mar;43(2):199–218. doi: 10.1188/16.ONF.199-218. - DOI - PubMed
    1. King AJ, Evans M, Moore TH, Paterson C, Sharp D, Persad R, Huntley AL. Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men's experiences and unmet needs. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2015 Sep;24(5):618–34. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12286. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25630851 - DOI - PMC - PubMed