Effects of Web-Based and Mobile Self-Care Support in Addition to Standard Care in Patients After Radical Prostatectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 37672332
- PMCID: PMC10512115
- DOI: 10.2196/44320
Effects of Web-Based and Mobile Self-Care Support in Addition to Standard Care in Patients After Radical Prostatectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer is a common form of cancer that is often treated with radical prostatectomy, which can leave patients with urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Self-care (pelvic floor muscle exercises and physical activity) is recommended to reduce the side effects. As more and more men are living in the aftermath of treatment, effective rehabilitation support is warranted. Digital self-care support has the potential to improve patient outcomes, but it has rarely been evaluated longitudinally in randomized controlled trials. Therefore, we developed and evaluated the effects of digital self-care support (electronic Patient Activation in Treatment at Home [ePATH]) on prostate-specific symptoms.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of web-based and mobile self-care support on urinary continence, sexual function, and self-care, compared with standard care, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after radical prostatectomy.
Methods: A multicenter randomized controlled trial with 2 study arms was conducted, with the longitudinal effects of additional digital self-care support (ePATH) compared with those of standard care alone. ePATH was designed based on the self-determination theory to strengthen patients' activation in self-care through nurse-assisted individualized modules. Men planned for radical prostatectomy at 3 county hospitals in southern Sweden were included offline and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. The effects of ePATH were evaluated for 1 year after surgery using self-assessed questionnaires. Linear mixed models and ordinal regression analyses were performed.
Results: This study included 170 men (85 in each group) from January 2018 to December 2019. The participants in the intervention and control groups did not differ in their demographic characteristics. In the intervention group, 64% (53/83) of the participants used ePATH, but the use declined over time. The linear mixed model showed no substantial differences between the groups in urinary continence (β=-5.60; P=.09; 95% CI -12.15 to -0.96) or sexual function (β=-.12; P=.97; 95% CI -7.05 to -6.81). Participants in the intervention and control groups did not differ in physical activity (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI 0.71-1.89; P=.57) or pelvic floor muscle exercises (odds ratio 1.51, 95% CI 0.86-2.66; P=.15).
Conclusions: ePATH did not affect postoperative side effects or self-care but reflected how this support may work in typical clinical conditions. To complement standard rehabilitation, digital self-care support must be adapted to the context and individual preferences for use and effect.
Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN18055968; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18055968.
International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/11625.
Keywords: eHealth; linear mixed model; mHealth; mobile health; pelvic exercise; physical activity; prostate cancer; prostatic neoplasms; radical prostatectomy; randomized controlled trial; self-care; sexual dysfunction; telemedicine; urinary incontinence; web-based.
©Camilla Wennerberg, Amanda Hellström, Kristina Schildmeijer, Mirjam Ekstedt. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (https://cancer.jmir.org), 06.09.2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10512115/bin/cancer_v9i1e44320_fig1.gif)
![Figure 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10512115/bin/cancer_v9i1e44320_fig2.gif)
Similar articles
-
Enhanced Patient Activation in Cancer Care Transitions: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Tailored Electronic Health Intervention for Men With Prostate Cancer.JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 22;8(3):e11625. doi: 10.2196/11625. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019. PMID: 30900999 Free PMC article.
-
Basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for women with urinary incontinence: the OPAL RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Dec;24(70):1-144. doi: 10.3310/hta24700. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 33289476 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A pilot randomized trial of conventional versus advanced pelvic floor exercises to treat urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a study protocol.BMC Urol. 2015 Sep 16;15:94. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0088-4. BMC Urol. 2015. PMID: 26377550 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1:CD001843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001843.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 20;1:CD001843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001843.pub5. PMID: 22258946 Updated. Review.
-
Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise for continence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 31;11:1186067. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1186067. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37588123 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Strączyńska A, Weber-Rajek M, Strojek K, Piekorz Z, Styczyńska H, Goch A, Radzimińska A. The impact of pelvic floor muscle training on urinary incontinence in men after Radical Prostatectomy (RP) - a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Nov 12;14:1997–2005. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S228222. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/31814714 228222 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- King AJ, Evans M, Moore TH, Paterson C, Sharp D, Persad R, Huntley AL. Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men's experiences and unmet needs. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2015 Sep;24(5):618–34. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12286. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25630851 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous