How suitable are clinical vignettes for the evaluation of symptom checker apps? A test theoretical perspective
- PMID: 37614591
- PMCID: PMC10444026
- DOI: 10.1177/20552076231194929
How suitable are clinical vignettes for the evaluation of symptom checker apps? A test theoretical perspective
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the ability of case vignettes to assess the performance of symptom checker applications and to suggest refinements to the methodology used in case vignette-based audit studies.
Methods: We re-analyzed the publicly available data of two prominent case vignette-based symptom checker audit studies by calculating common metrics of test theory. Furthermore, we developed a new metric, the Capability Comparison Score (CCS), which compares symptom checker capability while controlling for the difficulty of the set of cases each symptom checker evaluated. We then scrutinized whether applying test theory and the CCS altered the performance ranking of the investigated symptom checkers.
Results: In both studies, most symptom checkers changed their rank order when adjusting the triage capability for item difficulty (ID) with the CCS. The previously reported triage accuracies commonly overestimated the capability of symptom checkers because they did not account for the fact that symptom checkers tend to selectively appraise easier cases (i.e., with high ID values). Also, many case vignettes in both studies showed insufficient (very low and even negative) values of item-total correlation (ITC), suggesting that individual items or the composition of item sets are of low quality.
Conclusions: A test-theoretic perspective helps identify previously undetected threats to the validity of case vignette-based symptom checker assessments and provides guidance and specific metrics to improve the quality of case vignettes, in particular by controlling for the difficulty of the vignettes an app was (not) able to evaluate correctly. Such measures might prove more meaningful than accuracy alone for the competitive assessment of symptom checkers. Our approach helps elaborate and standardize the methodology used for appraising symptom checker capability, which, ultimately, may yield more reliable results.
Keywords: Digital health; care navigation; case vignettes; methodology; patient-centered care; self-triage; symptom checker; test theory; urgency assessment.
© The Author(s) 2023.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Triage Accuracy of Symptom Checker Apps: 5-Year Follow-up Evaluation.J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 10;24(5):e31810. doi: 10.2196/31810. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35536633 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of a Digital Symptom Checker Tool's Accuracy in Suggesting Reproductive Health Conditions: Clinical Vignettes Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Dec 5;11:e46718. doi: 10.2196/46718. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023. PMID: 38051574 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance of Symptom Checkers: Clinical Vignette Study.JMIR AI. 2024 Apr 29;3:e46875. doi: 10.2196/46875. JMIR AI. 2024. PMID: 38875676 Free PMC article.
-
The diagnostic and triage accuracy of digital and online symptom checker tools: a systematic review.NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Aug 17;5(1):118. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00667-w. NPJ Digit Med. 2022. PMID: 35977992 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Digital and online symptom checkers and assessment services for urgent care to inform a new digital platform: a systematic review.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2019 Aug. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2019 Aug. PMID: 31433612 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
[Short paths to diagnosis with artificial intelligence: systematic literature review on diagnostic decision support systems].Schmerz. 2024 Feb;38(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s00482-023-00777-8. Epub 2024 Jan 2. Schmerz. 2024. PMID: 38165492 German.
References
-
- EPatient Analytics GmbH. EPatient Survey 2020, https://www.hcm-magazin.de/epatient-survey-2020-digital-health-studie/15... (2020, accessed 6 March 2021).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources