Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):88-93.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005996. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

Delayed Versus Early Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Adult Patients With Acute Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Delayed Versus Early Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Adult Patients With Acute Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Sunil V Patel et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether delaying appendectomy until the following morning is non-inferior to immediate surgery in those with acute appendicitis presenting at night.

Background: Despite a lack of supporting evidence, those with acute appendicitis who present at night frequently have surgery delayed until the after morning.

Methods: The delay trial is a noninferiority randomized controlled trial conducted between 2018 and 22 at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Canada. Adults with imaging confirmed acute appendicitis who presented at night (8:00 pm -4:00 am ). Delaying surgery until after 6:00 am was compared with immediate surgery. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complications. An a prior noninferiority margin of 15% was deemed clinically relevant.

Results: One hundred twenty-seven of the planned 140 patients were enrolled in the Delayed Versus Early Laparoscopic Appendectomy (DELAY) trial (59 in the delayed group and 68 in the immediate group). The two groups were similar at baseline. The mean time between the decision to operate and surgery was longer in the delayed group (11.0 vs 4.4 hours, P < 0.0001). The primary outcome occurred in 6/59 (10.2%) of those in the delayed group versus 15/67 (22.4%) of those in the immediate group ( P = 0.07). The difference between groups met the a priori noninferiority criteria of +15% (risk difference -12.2%, 95% CI: -24.4% to +0.4%, test of noninferiority P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: The DELAY study is the first trial to assess delaying appendectomy in those with acute appendicitis. We demonstrate the noninferiority of delaying surgery until the after morning.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03524573.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pfuntner A, Wier LM, Stocks C. Most Frequent Procedures Performed in U.S. Hospitals, 2010. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006.
    1. Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ. The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study. Ann Surg. 1995;221:278–281.
    1. Boomer LA, Cooper JN, Anandalwar S, et al. Delaying appendectomy does not lead to higher rates of surgical site infections: a multi-institutional analysis of children with appendicitis. Ann Surg. 2016;264:164–168.
    1. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, et al. Effect of delay to operation on outcomes in adults with acute appendicitis. Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2010;145:886–892.
    1. Jeon BG, Kim HJ, Jung KH, et al. Appendectomy: should it be performed so quickly? Am Surg. 2016;82:65–74.

Publication types

Associated data