Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul-Aug;49(4):441-451.
doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0053.

The effect of perioperative pelvic floor muscle exercise on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

The effect of perioperative pelvic floor muscle exercise on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis

Erkang Geng et al. Int Braz J Urol. 2023 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) is the most common conservative management for urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP). We performed this meta-analysis to investigate whether PFME during the entire perioperative period, including before and after RP, can significantly improve the recovery of postoperative UI.

Methods: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCT) from PubMed, Medline, web of science, Cochrane library, and clinicalitrials.com prior to October 2022. Efficacy data were pooled and analyzed using Review Manager Version 5.3. Pooled analyses of urinary incontinence rates 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were conducted, using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: We included a total of 15 RCT studies involving 2178 patients received RP. Postoperative UI could be improved after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, and the OR were 0.26 (95%CI:0.15-0.46) 0.30 (95%CI: 0.11-0.80) 0.20 (95%CI: 0.07- 0.56) in postoperative PFME group compared to no PFME group. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in 12 months after surgery, and the OR was 0.85(95%CI: 0.48,1.51). There were similar results in perioperative PFME group compared to no PFME group with the OR of 0.35 (95%CI: 0.12, 0.98) and 0.40 (95%CI: 0.21, 0.75) in 1 and 3 months after surgery. Our results indicated no significant difference between perioperative PFME group and postoperative PFME group. The OR was 0.58 (95%CI: 0.20-1.71) 0.58 (95%CI:0.20-0.71) and 0.66 (95%CI: 0.32-1.38) in 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery.

Conclusion: Application of PFME after RP significantly reduced the incidence of early postoperative UI, and additional preoperative PFME had no significant improvement on the recovery of UI.

Keywords: Urinary Incontinence; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Prostatic Neoplasms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Supplementary Figure 2
Supplementary Figure 2. Risk of bias of included studies.
Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram of literature searches according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Risk of bias of included studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Meta-analysis of objective cure of UI between PFME and No PFME.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Meta-analysis of objective cure of UI between Perioperative PFME and No PFME.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Meta-analysis of objective cure of UI between Perioperative PFME and Postoperative PFME.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. - PubMed
    1. Nguyen-Nielsen M, Borre M. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies for Prostate Cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2016;46:484–490. - PubMed
    1. Moschovas MC, Patel V. Neurovascular bundle preservation in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: How I do it after 15.000 cases. Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48:212–219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Du Y, Long Q, Guan B, Mu L, Tian J, Jiang Y, et al. Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients: A System Review and Meta-Analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:272–287. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hagen S, McClurg D, Bugge C, Hay-Smith J, Dean SG, Elders A, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for female stress or mixed urinary incontinence: protocol for the OPAL randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e024153 - PMC - PubMed