Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;14(3):432-437.
doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 Mar 28.

Perspective: Examining Conflicts of Interest for Professional Service within the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee

Affiliations

Perspective: Examining Conflicts of Interest for Professional Service within the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee

Vivica I Kraak. Adv Nutr. 2023 May.

Abstract

Judgments and integrity uphold professionalism. Failure to manage professional conflicts of interest (COIs) may undermine trust in an individual, practitioner, or institution. This perspective article examines standards for nutrition researchers and practitioners to manage COIs for the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) process. Thereafter, this article analyzes a study published by Mialon et al. that raised concerns about the expert advisory committee selection process and management of COIs for 20 professionals appointed by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the USDA, who served on a federal government advisory committee to review evidence for the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC) 2020 scientific report. The analysis found that Mialon et al. enumerated COIs for each DGAC member with industry, removed from the original context, which prevented readers from assessing the COI risk. Moreover, the USDA ethics office concluded that "the 20 committee members were in full compliance with the federal ethics rules applicable to special government employees." I conclude that Mialon et al. could use institutional mechanisms to encourage the USDA and HHS to strengthen future COI policies and procedures, aligned with the 2022 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine report recommendations to improve the DGA 2025 to 2030 process.

Keywords: Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee; advisory committee; bias; conflicts of interest; dietary guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Timeline and tasks completed by the 2021 NASEM expert consensus committee that evaluated the process to develop the DGA, 2020–2025. DGA, Dietary Guidelines for Americans; DGAC, Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee; HHS, Health and Human Services; NASEM, National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. Figure was adapted and reproduced with permission from the National Academy of Sciences, Courtesy of the National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stead W.W. The complex and multifaceted aspects of conflicts of interest. JAMA. 2017;317:1765–1767. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3435. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fineberg H.V. Conflict of interest: why does it matter? JAMA. 2017;317:1717–1718. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1869. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mialon M., Vandevijvere S., Carriedo-Lutzenkirchen A., Bero L., Gomes F., Petticrew M., et al. Mechanisms for addressing and managing the influence of corporations on public health policy, research and practice: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2020;10 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034082. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Becker G.E., Ching C., Nguyen T.T., Cashin J., Zambrano P., Mathisen R. Babies before business: protecting the integrity of health professionals from institutional conflict of interest. BMJ Glob. Health. 2022;7 doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009640. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mozaffarian D. Conflict of interest and the role of the food industry in nutrition research. JAMA. 2017;317:1755–1756. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3456. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources