Origin of the propatagium in non-avian dinosaurs
- PMID: 36823531
- PMCID: PMC9951497
- DOI: 10.1186/s40851-023-00204-x
Origin of the propatagium in non-avian dinosaurs
Abstract
Avian wings as organs for aerial locomotion are furnished with a highly specialized musculoskeletal system compared with the forelimbs of other tetrapod vertebrates. Among the specializations, the propatagium, which accompanies a skeletal muscle spanning between the shoulder and wrist on the leading edge of the wing, represents an evolutionary novelty established at a certain point in the lineage toward crown birds. However, because of the rarity of soft-tissue preservation in the fossil record, the evolutionary origin of the avian propatagium has remained elusive. Here we focus on articulated skeletons in the fossil record to show that angles of elbow joints in fossils are indicators of the propatagium in extant lineages of diapsids (crown birds and non-dinosaurian diapsids), and then use this relationship to narrow down the phylogenetic position acquiring the propatagium to the common ancestor of maniraptorans. Our analyses support the hypothesis that the preserved propatagium-like soft tissues in non-avian theropod dinosaurs (oviraptorosaurian Caudipteryx and dromaeosaurian Microraptor) are homologous with the avian propatagium, and indicate that all maniraptoran dinosaurs likely possessed the propatagium even before the origin of flight. On the other hand, the preserved angles of wrist joints in non-avian theropods are significantly greater than those in birds, suggesting that the avian interlocking wing-folding mechanism involving the ulna and radius had not fully evolved in non-avian theropods. Our study underscores that the avian wing was acquired through modifications of preexisting structures including the feather and propatagium.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
![Fig. 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9951497/bin/40851_2023_204_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9951497/bin/40851_2023_204_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 3](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9951497/bin/40851_2023_204_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 4](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9951497/bin/40851_2023_204_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 5](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9951497/bin/40851_2023_204_Fig5_HTML.gif)
Similar articles
-
Do feathered dinosaurs exist? Testing the hypothesis on neontological and paleontological evidence.J Morphol. 2005 Nov;266(2):125-66. doi: 10.1002/jmor.10382. J Morphol. 2005. PMID: 16217748
-
Feathered dinosaurs from China and the evolution of major avian characters.Integr Zool. 2006 Mar;1(1):4-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2006.00004.x. Integr Zool. 2006. PMID: 21395983
-
Anatomy of the propatagium: The great horned owl (Bubo virginianus).J Morphol. 1994 Feb;219(2):205-224. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1052190209. J Morphol. 1994. PMID: 29865371
-
Air-filled postcranial bones in theropod dinosaurs: physiological implications and the 'reptile'-bird transition.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012 Feb;87(1):168-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00190.x. Epub 2011 Jul 7. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012. PMID: 21733078 Review.
-
Morphology and distribution of scales, dermal ossifications, and other non-feather integumentary structures in non-avialan theropod dinosaurs.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Jun;97(3):960-1004. doi: 10.1111/brv.12829. Epub 2022 Jan 6. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022. PMID: 34991180 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative phylogenomics and phylotranscriptomics provide insights into the genetic complexity of nitrogen-fixing root-nodule symbiosis.Plant Commun. 2024 Jan 8;5(1):100671. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100671. Epub 2023 Aug 8. Plant Commun. 2024. PMID: 37553834 Free PMC article.
References
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources