Feeling One Thing and Doing Another: How Expressions of Guilt and Shame Influence Hypocrisy Judgment
- PMID: 36546987
- PMCID: PMC9774094
- DOI: 10.3390/bs12120504
Feeling One Thing and Doing Another: How Expressions of Guilt and Shame Influence Hypocrisy Judgment
Abstract
The present study investigated how people, as uninvolved social observers (i.e., those not affected by the emotion expresser's behavior), judge hypocrisy in a target who publicly expresses their self-conscious emotions (i.e., shame and guilt) after making an immoral decision, then repeats the same immoral behavior again. Results across the two studies conducted showed that participants viewed the target as more hypocritical when the target expressed guilt (vs. shame) for their past misdeed and then committed the same act again. The present study suggests that social perceivers tend to infer expressions of guilt (and of shame to a lesser degree) as signaling future changes, which is reflected in judgments of hypocrisy. The study further discusses implications for the social functions of emotional expression and communication.
Keywords: emotion communication; emotion expression; future change; guilt; hypocrisy; moral judgment; redemption; self-conscious emotion; shame.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest. The funder had no role in the design of the study; collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; or decision to publish the results.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Punishing hypocrisy: the roles of hypocrisy and moral emotions in deciding culpability and punishment of criminal and civil moral transgressors.Cogn Emot. 2014;28(1):59-83. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.801339. Epub 2013 Jun 3. Cogn Emot. 2014. PMID: 23725235
-
Effects of anger, guilt, and envy on moral hypocrisy.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jan;38(1):129-39. doi: 10.1177/0146167211422365. Epub 2011 Sep 14. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012. PMID: 21918064
-
Neural and Cognitive Signatures of Guilt Predict Hypocritical Blame.Psychol Sci. 2022 Nov;33(11):1909-1927. doi: 10.1177/09567976221122765. Epub 2022 Oct 6. Psychol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36201792
-
A Comparison of the Social-Adaptive Perspective and Functionalist Perspective on Guilt and Shame.Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Dec 11;7(4):83. doi: 10.3390/bs7040083. Behav Sci (Basel). 2017. PMID: 29232888 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gender differences in self-conscious emotional experience: a meta-analysis.Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):947-81. doi: 10.1037/a0027930. Epub 2012 Apr 2. Psychol Bull. 2012. PMID: 22468881 Review.
Cited by
-
Consideration of Future Consequences Affects the Perception and Interpretation of Self-Conscious Emotions.Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Aug 1;13(8):640. doi: 10.3390/bs13080640. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37622780 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tangney J.P., Dearing R.L. Shame and Guilt. Guilford Publications, Inc.; New York, NY, USA: 2002.
-
- Leary M. How the self became involved in affective experience: Three sources of self-reflective emotions. In: Tracy J.L., Robins R.W., Tangney J.P., editors. The Self-Conscious Emotions: Theory and Research. Guilford Press; New York, NY, USA: 2007. pp. 38–52.
-
- Tracy J.L., Robins R.W. Putting the self into self-conscious emotions: A theoretical model. Psychol. Inq. 2004;15:103–125. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli1502_01. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous