Effect of Awake Prone Positioning on Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 35569448
- PMCID: PMC9108999
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.7993
Effect of Awake Prone Positioning on Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: The efficacy and safety of prone positioning is unclear in nonintubated patients with acute hypoxemia and COVID-19.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of prone positioning in nonintubated adult patients with acute hypoxemia and COVID-19.
Design, setting, and participants: Pragmatic, unblinded randomized clinical trial conducted at 21 hospitals in Canada, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the US. Eligible adult patients with COVID-19 were not intubated and required oxygen (≥40%) or noninvasive ventilation. A total of 400 patients were enrolled between May 19, 2020, and May 18, 2021, and final follow-up was completed in July 2021.
Intervention: Patients were randomized to awake prone positioning (n = 205) or usual care without prone positioning (control; n = 195).
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation within 30 days of randomization. The secondary outcomes included mortality at 60 days, days free from invasive mechanical ventilation or noninvasive ventilation at 30 days, days free from the intensive care unit or hospital at 60 days, adverse events, and serious adverse events.
Results: Among the 400 patients who were randomized (mean age, 57.6 years [SD, 12.83 years]; 117 [29.3%] were women), all (100%) completed the trial. In the first 4 days after randomization, the median duration of prone positioning was 4.8 h/d (IQR, 1.8 to 8.0 h/d) in the awake prone positioning group vs 0 h/d (IQR, 0 to 0 h/d) in the control group. By day 30, 70 of 205 patients (34.1%) in the prone positioning group were intubated vs 79 of 195 patients (40.5%) in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.59 to 1.12], P = .20; absolute difference, -6.37% [95% CI, -15.83% to 3.10%]). Prone positioning did not significantly reduce mortality at 60 days (hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.40], P = .54; absolute difference, -1.15% [95% CI, -9.40% to 7.10%]) and had no significant effect on days free from invasive mechanical ventilation or noninvasive ventilation at 30 days or on days free from the intensive care unit or hospital at 60 days. There were no serious adverse events in either group. In the awake prone positioning group, 21 patients (10%) experienced adverse events and the most frequently reported were musculoskeletal pain or discomfort from prone positioning (13 of 205 patients [6.34%]) and desaturation (2 of 205 patients [0.98%]). There were no reported adverse events in the control group.
Conclusions and relevance: In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure from COVID-19, prone positioning, compared with usual care without prone positioning, did not significantly reduce endotracheal intubation at 30 days. However, the effect size for the primary study outcome was imprecise and does not exclude a clinically important benefit.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04350723.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
![Figure 1.](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9108999/bin/jama-e227993-g001.gif)
![Figure 2.](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9108999/bin/jama-e227993-g002.gif)
![Figure 3.](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9108999/bin/jama-e227993-g003.gif)
Comment in
-
In COVID-19 acute hypoxemia, awake prone positioning vs. usual care did not reduce intubation at 30 d.Ann Intern Med. 2022 Sep;175(9):JC99. doi: 10.7326/J22-0068. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Ann Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 36063555 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Awake Prone Positioning on Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Failure.JAMA. 2022 Oct 4;328(13):1354. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.13991. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 36194223 No abstract available.
-
Effect of Awake Prone Positioning on Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Failure.JAMA. 2022 Oct 4;328(13):1353-1354. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.13988. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 36194224 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs Usual Respiratory Support on Mortality Among Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19: The HELMET-COVID Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2022 Sep 20;328(11):1063-1072. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.15599. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 36125473 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Awake prone positioning in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19: the PROFLO multicenter randomized clinical trial.Crit Care. 2021 Jun 14;25(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03602-9. Crit Care. 2021. PMID: 34127046 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen on Days Free of Respiratory Support in Patients With COVID-19 and Moderate to Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: The HENIVOT Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2021 May 4;325(17):1731-1743. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4682. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 33764378 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 13;2015(11):CD008095. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008095.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26561745 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of mechanical ventilation in the prone position on clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CMAJ. 2008 Apr 22;178(9):1153-61. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071802. CMAJ. 2008. PMID: 18427090 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A randomised clinical trial of awake prone positioning in COVID-19 suspects with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Apr 13;39:101295. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101295. eCollection 2024 Jun. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024. PMID: 38689829 Free PMC article.
-
A Comprehensive Review of Prone Ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit: Challenges and Solutions.Cureus. 2024 Mar 30;16(3):e57247. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57247. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38686225 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Conscious prone positioning in nonintubated COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.Crit Care Sci. 2024 Apr 8;36:e20240176en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240176-en. eCollection 2024. Crit Care Sci. 2024. PMID: 38597483 Free PMC article.
-
When hope meets reality: the challenges of awake proning in unmonitored settings.J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jan 30;16(1):810-815. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1588. Epub 2023 Dec 11. J Thorac Dis. 2024. PMID: 38410573 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Ventilatory Management of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Due to SARS-CoV-2.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 5;12(24):7509. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247509. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38137578 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical