Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 17;12(1):4580.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08465-w.

Development of web-based dynamic nomogram to predict survival in patients with gastric cancer: a population-based study

Affiliations

Development of web-based dynamic nomogram to predict survival in patients with gastric cancer: a population-based study

Atefeh Talebi et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most frequent malignancy worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-associated mortality. The study's goal was to construct a predictive model and nomograms to predict the survival of GC patients. This historical cohort study assessed 733 patients who underwent treatments for GC. The univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard (CPH) survival analyses were applied to identify the factors related to overall survival (OS). A dynamic nomogram was developed as a graphical representation of the CPH regression model. The internal validation of the nomogram was evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent AUC. The results of the multivariable Cox model revealed that the age of patients, body mass index (BMI), grade of tumor, and depth of tumor elevate the mortality hazard of gastric cancer patients (P < 0.05). The built nomogram had a discriminatory performance, with a C-index of 0.64 (CI 0.61, 0.67). We constructed and validated an original predictive nomogram for OS in patients with GC. Furthermore, nomograms may help predict the individual risk of OS in patients treated for GC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier survival curves by American joint committee on cancer staging, along with the number at risks in gastric cancer patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predictive nomogram for survival in Gastric cancer patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Web-based survival rate calculator (Dynamic Nomogram (shinyapps.io)) to predict the survival of GC patients; Two patients who are 77 years old, no surgery, no family history, PT3 and 25 ≤ BMI < 30, but have different grade, well (black line) and poorly (blue line), according to the web survival rate calculator.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Time-dependent AUC summary at evaluation time points. (B) Decision curve analysis. (C) Internal calibration using bootstrap resampling at 1 year and 2 years.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Díaz del Arco C, Ortega Medina L, Estrada Muñoz L, Molina Roldán E, Cerón Nieto M, García Gómez de las Heras S, et al. Are Borrmann’s types of advanced gastric cancer distinct clinicopathological and molecular entities? A western study. Cancers. 2021;13(12):3081. doi: 10.3390/cancers13123081. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stojanovic MM, Rancic NK, Andjelkovic Apostolovic MR, Ignjatovic AM, Ilic MV. Trends of stomach cancer in Central Serbia. Medicina. 2021;57(7):665. doi: 10.3390/medicina57070665. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dassen AE, Dikken JL, Bosscha K, Wouters MW, Cats A, van de Velde CJ, et al. Gastric cancer: Decreasing incidence but stable survival in the Netherlands. Acta Oncol. 2014;53(1):138–142. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.789139. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. Cancer J. Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yaprak G, Tataroglu D, Dogan B, Pekyurek M. Prognostic factors for survival in patients with gastric cancer: Single-centre experience. Northern Clin. Istanbul. 2020;7(2):146. - PMC - PubMed