Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 1;83(2):21m14006.
doi: 10.4088/JCP.21m14006.

Postpartum Thoughts of Infant-Related Harm and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Relation to Maternal Physical Aggression Toward the Infant

Nichole Fairbrother  1   2 , Fanie Collardeau  3 , Sheila R Woody  4 , David A Wolfe  5 , Jonathan M Fawcett  6
Affiliations

Postpartum Thoughts of Infant-Related Harm and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Relation to Maternal Physical Aggression Toward the Infant

Nichole Fairbrother et al. J Clin Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Objective: Unwanted intrusive thoughts (UITs) of intentional infant-related harm are ubiquitous among new mothers and frequently raise concerns about infant safety. The purpose of this research was to assess the relation of new mothers' UITs of intentional, infant-related harm and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) with maternal aggression toward the infant and to document the prevalence of maternal aggression toward the infant.

Methods: From a prospective, province-wide, unselected sample of 763 English-speaking postpartum women, a total of 388 participants provided data for this portion of the research. Participants completed 2 questionnaires and interviews postpartum to assess UITs of infant-related harm, OCD (based on DSM-5 criteria), and maternal aggression toward the infant. Data for this research were collected from February 9, 2014, to February 14, 2017.

Results: Overall, few participants (2.9%; 95% CI, 1.5% to 4.7%) reported behaving aggressively toward their infant. Participants who reported UITs of intentional, infant-related harm (44.4%; 95% CI, 39.2% to 49.7%) were not more likely to report aggression toward their newborn compared with women who did not report this ideation (2.6%; 95% CI, 0.9% to 5.8%; and 3.1%; 95% CI, 1.3% to 6.2%, respectively). The same was true for women with and without OCD (1.9%; 95% CI, 0.3% to 6.4%; and 3.5%; 95% CI, 1.8% to 6.0%), respectively.

Conclusions: This study found no evidence that the occurrence of either UITs of intentional, infant-related harm or OCD is associated with an increased risk of infant harm. The prevalence of child abuse of infants in this sample (2.9%) is lower than reported in others (4%-9%). Findings provide critical and reassuring information regarding the relation between new mothers' UITs of intentional harm and risk of physical violence toward the infant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Grants and funding