Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 8;9(2):227.
doi: 10.3390/children9020227.

Measuring Happiness in Adolescent Samples: A Systematic Review

Justė Lukoševičiūtė  1   2 , Gita Argustaitė-Zailskienė  1 , Kastytis Šmigelskas  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Measuring Happiness in Adolescent Samples: A Systematic Review

Justė Lukoševičiūtė et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Happiness is a phenomenon that relates to better mental and physical health and even longevity. There has been an increase in surveys assessing subjective well-being as well as happiness, one of the well-being components that reflect one's feelings or moods. Happiness is mostly measured in adult samples. There is a lack of an overview of the tools used to evaluate adolescent happiness, so this paper aimed to review them.

Methods: A literature search was performed in the PubMed and PsycArticles databases (2010-2019). In total, 133 papers met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review.

Results: The results are grouped according to the type of measure, single or multiple items, that was used in a study. Almost half of the studies (64 of 133) evaluated subjective happiness using single-item measures. The most commonly used scales were the 4-item Subjective Happiness Scale and the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire. Among the 133 articles analyzed, 18 reported some validation procedures related to happiness. However, in the majority of cases (14 studies), happiness was not the central phenomenon of validation, which suggests a lack of happiness validation studies.

Conclusions: Finally, recommendations for future research and for the choice of happiness assessment tools are presented.

Keywords: adolescent; happiness measurement; mental health; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart of the systematic literature review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The main features of the single-item measures.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Waterman A.S. Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1993;64:678–691. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678. - DOI
    1. Kraut R. Two conceptions of happiness. Philos. Rev. 1979;88:167–197. doi: 10.2307/2184505. - DOI
    1. Lyubomirsky S., Lepper H. A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Soc. Indic. Res. 1999;46:137–155. doi: 10.1023/A:1006824100041. - DOI
    1. Freire T., Ferreira G. Do I need to be positive to be happy? Considering the role of self-esteem, life satisfaction, and psychological distress in Portuguese adolescents’ subjective happiness. Psychol. Rep. 2020;123:1064–1082. doi: 10.1177/0033294119846064. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Helliwell J., Layard R., Sachs J. World Happiness Report. The Earth Institute, Columbia University; New York, NY, USA: 2021. [(accessed on 13 January 2022)]. Available online: https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/stream/pdf/52383/1.0053622/3.

LinkOut - more resources