Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Mar 29:54:jrm00266.
doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2032.

Effects of Whole-Body Vibration Therapy on Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of Whole-Body Vibration Therapy on Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Chen Guang Qiu et al. J Rehabil Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability and medical costs. The effect of whole-body vibration in knee osteoarthritis is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the effects and safety of whole-body vibration on pain, stiffness, physical function, and muscle strength in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and EMBASE databases were searched (date last accessed 1 April 2021) using the key words "vibration" and "knee osteoarthritis", to identify all randomized controlled trials related to whole-body vibration and knee osteoarthritis. Outcomes related to pain, stiffness, physical function, muscle strength, adverse events were included. The risk of bias and quality were assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration tool and PEDro scale. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Subgroup analysis was performed for low- and high-frequency interventions.

Results: A total of 14 randomized controlled trials involving 559 patients with knee osteoarthritis met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies were good-quality trials (PEDro score=6-8), and 5 studies were fairquality trials (PEDro score=4-5). Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. One study showed negative effects of whole-body vibration on knee osteoarthritis. The duration of whole-body vibration ranged from 4 to 24 weeks. Meta-analysis revealed that whole-body vibration with strengthening exercises has a significant treatment effect on pain score (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.46 points, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.20-0.71, p = 0.0004), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC-function) (SMD = 0.51 points, 95% CI = 0.27-0.75, p < 0.0001), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test (SMD = 0.82 points, 95% CI = 0.46-1.18, p < 0.00001), extensor isokinetic peak torque (SMD = 0.65 points, 95% CI = 0.00-1.29, p = 0.05), peak power (SMD = 0.68 points, 95% CI = 0.26-1.10, p = 0.001), and extensor isometric strength (SMD = 0.44 points, 95% CI = 0.13-0.75, p = 0.006). Both low-frequency (10-30 Hz) and highfrequency (30-40 Hz) whole-body vibration were associated with significant changes in pain, physical function, and knee extensor strength (p < 0.05). WBV was not associated with significant changes in stiffness, balance ability, quality of life, and knee flexor strength. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: Meta-analysis showed that low-frequency and high-frequency whole-body vibration had additional positive effects compared with strengthening exercises alone on pain, knee extensor muscle strength, and physical function in individuals with knee OA. Whole-body vibration with strengthening exercises can be incorporated into treatment protocols.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Assessment of risk of bias of included studies.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of whole-body vibration (WBV) plus exercise vs exercise alone for pain. SD: standard deviation; VAS: visual analogue scale; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of whole-body vibration (WBV) plus exercise vs exercise alone for the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). SD: standard deviation; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot of meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of whole-body vibration (WBV) plus exercise vs exercise alone for Timed Up and Go test (TUG) test. SD: standard deviation; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot of meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of whole-body vibration (WBV) plus exercise vs exercise alone for change in chair stand test (CST) and gait speed. SD: standard deviation; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Forest plot of meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of whole-body vibration (WBV) plus exercise vs exercise alone for change in 6-minute walk test (6MWT). SD: standard deviation; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Forest plot of meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of whole-body vibration (WBV) plus exercise vs exercise alone for change in Berg Balance Scale (BBS). SD: standard deviation; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Forest plot of meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of whole-body vibration (WBV) plus exercise vs exercise alone for change in knee extensor isokinetic peak torque (E ISK PT) and extensor isokinetic peak power (E ISK PW). SD: standard deviation; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Forest plot of meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of whole-body vibration (WBV) plus exercise vs exercise alone for change in knee extenosr isometric strength (E ISM). SD: standard deviation; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Forest plot of meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of whole-body vibration (WBV) plus exercise vs exercise alone for change in knee flexor isokinetic peak torque (F ISK PT) and flexor isokinetic peak power (F ISK PW). SD: standard deviation; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McAlindon TE, LaValley MP, Harvey WF, Price LL, Driban JB, Zhang M, et al. . Effect of intra-articular triamcinolone vs saline on knee cartilage volume and pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017; 317: 1967–1975. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katz JN, Arant KR, Loeser RF. Diagnosis and treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a review. JAMA 2021; 325: 568–578. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spitaels D, Mamouris P, Vaes B, Smeets M, Luyten F, Hermens R, et al. . Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in general practice: a registry-based study. BMJ Open 2020; 10: e031734. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennell KL, Hunter DJ, Hinman RS. Management of osteoarthritis of the knee. BMJ 2012; 345: e4934. - PubMed
    1. Vannabouathong C, Bhandari M, Bedi A, Khanna V, Yung P, Shetty V, et al. . Nonoperative Treatments for knee osteoarthritis: an evaluation of treatment characteristics and the intra-articular placebo effect: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 2018; 6: e5. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources