Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;15(1):7.
doi: 10.1007/s12152-022-09481-3. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

Novel Neurorights: From Nonsense to Substance

Jan Christoph Bublitz  1
Affiliations

Novel Neurorights: From Nonsense to Substance

Jan Christoph Bublitz. Neuroethics. 2022.

Abstract

This paper analyses recent calls for so called "neurorights", suggested novel human rights whose adoption is allegedly required because of advances in neuroscience, exemplified by a proposal of the Neurorights Initiative. Advances in neuroscience and technology are indeed impressive and pose a range of challenges for the law, and some novel applications give grounds for human rights concerns. But whether addressing these concerns requires adopting novel human rights, and whether the proposed neurorights are suitable candidates, are a different matter. This paper argues that the proposed rights, as individuals and a class, should not be adopted and lobbying on their behalf should stop. The proposal tends to promote rights inflationism, is tainted by neuroexceptionalism and neuroessentialism, and lacks grounding in relevant scholarship. None of the proposed individual rights passes quality criteria debated in the field. While understandable from a moral perspective, the proposal is fundamentally flawed from a legal perspective. Rather than conjuring up novel human rights, existing rights should be further developed in face of changing societal circumstances and technological possibilities.

Keywords: Human rights; Neuroessentialism; Neurorights; Neuroscience; Regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interests/Competing InterestsThe author declares no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bentham, Jeremy. 1796. Anarchical Fallacies. Reprinted in: Waldron (ed.), ‘Nonsense upon stilts’. Bentham, Burke and Marx on the Rights of Man (1987). Methuen.
    1. Munoz Joseph. Correspondence: Chile – the Right to Free Will needs definition. Nature. 2019;574(7780):634. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03295-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yuste Rafael, Goering Sara, Agüera y Arcas Blaise, et al. Four Ethical Priorities for Neurotechnologies and AI. Nature. 2017;551(7679):159–163. doi: 10.1038/551159a. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yuste, Rafael. 2019. Adress to the 140th Assembly of the Inter-Parliamentary Union. Doha, April 2019. https://www.ipu.org/sites/default/files/documents/yuste_speech_final_0.pdf.
    1. Tasioulas, John. 2011. The inflation of concepts. AEON. https://aeon.co/essays/conceptual-overreach-threatens-the-quality-of-pub....

LinkOut - more resources