Estimating impact of food choices on life expectancy: A modeling study
- PMID: 35134067
- PMCID: PMC8824353
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003889
Estimating impact of food choices on life expectancy: A modeling study
Erratum in
-
Correction: Estimating impact of food choices on life expectancy: A modeling study.PLoS Med. 2022 Mar 25;19(3):e1003962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003962. eCollection 2022 Mar. PLoS Med. 2022. PMID: 35333861 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: Interpreting and utilizing the findings of nutritional research can be challenging to clinicians, policy makers, and even researchers. To make better decisions about diet, innovative methods that integrate best evidence are needed. We have developed a decision support model that predicts how dietary choices affect life expectancy (LE).
Methods and findings: Based on meta-analyses and data from the Global Burden of Disease study (2019), we used life table methodology to estimate how LE changes with sustained changes in the intake of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, refined grains, nuts, legumes, fish, eggs, milk/dairy, red meat, processed meat, and sugar-sweetened beverages. We present estimates (with 95% uncertainty intervals [95% UIs]) for an optimized diet and a feasibility approach diet. An optimal diet had substantially higher intake than a typical diet of whole grains, legumes, fish, fruits, vegetables, and included a handful of nuts, while reducing red and processed meats, sugar-sweetened beverages, and refined grains. A feasibility approach diet was a midpoint between an optimal and a typical Western diet. A sustained change from a typical Western diet to the optimal diet from age 20 years would increase LE by more than a decade for women from the United States (10.7 [95% UI 8.4 to 12.3] years) and men (13.0 [95% UI 9.4 to 14.3] years). The largest gains would be made by eating more legumes (females: 2.2 [95% UI 1.1 to 3.4]; males: 2.5 [95% UI 1.1 to 3.9]), whole grains (females: 2.0 [95% UI 1.3 to 2.7]; males: 2.3 [95% UI 1.6 to 3.0]), and nuts (females: 1.7 [95% UI 1.5 to 2.0]; males: 2.0 [95% UI 1.7 to 2.3]), and less red meat (females: 1.6 [95% UI 1.5 to 1.8]; males: 1.9 [95% UI 1.7 to 2.1]) and processed meat (females: 1.6 [95% UI 1.5 to 1.8]; males: 1.9 [95% UI 1.7 to 2.1]). Changing from a typical diet to the optimized diet at age 60 years would increase LE by 8.0 (95% UI 6.2 to 9.3) years for women and 8.8 (95% UI 6.8 to 10.0) years for men, and 80-year-olds would gain 3.4 years (95% UI females: 2.6 to 3.8/males: 2.7 to 3.9). Change from typical to feasibility approach diet would increase LE by 6.2 (95% UI 3.5 to 8.1) years for 20-year-old women from the United States and 7.3 (95% UI 4.7 to 9.5) years for men. Using NutriGrade, the overall quality of evidence was assessed as moderate. The methodology provides population estimates under given assumptions and is not meant as individualized forecasting, with study limitations that include uncertainty for time to achieve full effects, the effect of eggs, white meat, and oils, individual variation in protective and risk factors, uncertainties for future development of medical treatments; and changes in lifestyle.
Conclusions: A sustained dietary change may give substantial health gains for people of all ages both for optimized and feasible changes. Gains are predicted to be larger the earlier the dietary changes are initiated in life. The Food4HealthyLife calculator that we provide online could be useful for clinicians, policy makers, and laypeople to understand the health impact of dietary choices.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Life expectancy gains from dietary modifications: a comparative modeling study in 7 countries.Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 Jul;120(1):170-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.04.028. Epub 2024 Apr 29. Am J Clin Nutr. 2024. PMID: 38692410
-
Food Groups and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.Adv Nutr. 2017 Nov 15;8(6):793-803. doi: 10.3945/an.117.017178. Print 2017 Nov. Adv Nutr. 2017. PMID: 29141965 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Food groups and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(7):1071-1090. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1392288. Epub 2017 Nov 7. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019. PMID: 29039970
-
Food groups and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 May;32(5):363-375. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0246-y. Epub 2017 Apr 10. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28397016 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association Between Dietary Factors and Mortality From Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States.JAMA. 2017 Mar 7;317(9):912-924. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0947. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 28267855 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Cereals and cereal products - a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023.Food Nutr Res. 2024 Feb 14;68. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10457. eCollection 2024. Food Nutr Res. 2024. PMID: 38571920 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Legumes and pulses - a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023.Food Nutr Res. 2024 Mar 26;68. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10484. eCollection 2024. Food Nutr Res. 2024. PMID: 38571918 Free PMC article. Review.
-
American College of Lifestyle Medicine Expert Consensus Statement: Lifestyle Medicine for Optimal Outcomes in Primary Care.Am J Lifestyle Med. 2023 Oct 25;18(2):269-293. doi: 10.1177/15598276231202970. eCollection 2024 Mar-Apr. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2023. PMID: 38559790
-
Nuts and seeds - a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023.Food Nutr Res. 2024 Feb 7;68. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10483. eCollection 2024. Food Nutr Res. 2024. PMID: 38370112 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Unacceptable use of substandard metrics in policy decisions which mandate large reductions in animal-source foods.NPJ Sci Food. 2024 Feb 5;8(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41538-024-00249-y. NPJ Sci Food. 2024. PMID: 38316809 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Aune D, Giovannucci E, Boffetta P, Fadnes LT, Keum N, Norat T, et al.. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all–cause mortality–a systematic review and dose–response meta–analysis of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(3):1029–56. Epub 2017 Mar 25. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw319 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Aune D, Keum N, Giovannucci E, Fadnes LT, Boffetta P, Greenwood DC, et al..Whole grain consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all cause and cause specific mortality: systematic review and dose–response meta–analysis of prospective studies. BMJ. 2016;353:i2716. Epub 2016 Jun 16. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2716 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Aune D, Keum N, Giovannucci E, Fadnes LT, Boffetta P, Greenwood DC, et al.. Nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, all–cause and cause–specific mortality: a systematic review and dose–response meta–analysis of prospective studies. BMC Med. 2016;14(1):207. Epub 2016 Dec 6. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0730-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources