Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0263575.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263575. eCollection 2022.

Progression in training volume and perceived psychological and physiological training distress in Norwegian student athletes: A cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Progression in training volume and perceived psychological and physiological training distress in Norwegian student athletes: A cross-sectional study

Cathrine Nyhus Hagum et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examined self-reported weekly training volume and perceived training distress in Norwegian student athletes according to gender, type of sport, school program, and school year. The Norwegian version of the Multicomponent Training Distress Scale (MTDS-N) was completed by 608 student athletes (M age = 17.29 ± .94). Univariate and multivariate techniques were used in data analyses. Results revealed significant differences in weekly training volume between sport types. No significant differences in weekly training volume were found for gender, school year, or school program. However, a multivariate effect was found for gender, with females perceiving higher levels of training distress than males. A multivariate interaction effect between school year and training volume was also observed. We recommend that practitioners use a conceptual framework to periodize training and monitor training distress in student athletes, particularly in females, to preserve physiological and psychological well-being and ensure a progressive training overload leading to positive performance development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Progression in weekly training volume across school years in different sport types.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Linear discriminant function plot showing the interaction of weekly training volume by school year and how the training volume groups separate.
The figure shows the means of each training volume group on the composite outcome variable that was created from the observed variables (i.e., training distress). To facilitate the interpretation of the figure, both the rs and the standardized coefficients from Table 5 could be examined.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Saavedra J, Þorgeirsson S, Kristjánsdóttir H, Halldórsson KÞ, Guðmundsdóttir ML, Einarsson IÞ. Comparison of Training Volumes in Different Elite Sportspersons According to Sex, Age, and Sport Practised. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2018;7.
    1. Borresen J, Lambert MI. The quantification of training load, the training response and the effect on performance. Sports medicine. 2009;39(9):779–95. doi: 10.2165/11317780-000000000-00000 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Halson SL. Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports medicine. 2014;44(2):139–47. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0253-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kellmann M, Bertollo M, Bosquet L, Brink M, Coutts AJ, Duffield R, et al.. Recovery and performance in sport: consensus statement. International journal of sports physiology performance. 2018;13(2):240–5. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0759 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soligard T, Schwellnus M, Alonso J-M, Bahr R, Clarsen B, Dijkstra HP, et al.. How much is too much?(Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(17):1030–41. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096581 - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.