Exploring menstrual products: A systematic review and meta-analysis of reusable menstrual pads for public health internationally
- PMID: 34559839
- PMCID: PMC8462722
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257610
Exploring menstrual products: A systematic review and meta-analysis of reusable menstrual pads for public health internationally
Abstract
Background: Girls and women need effective, safe, and affordable menstrual products. Single-use menstrual pads and tampons are regularly provided by agencies among resource-poor populations. Reusable menstrual pads (RMPs: fabric layers sewn together by an enterprise for manufacture of menstrual products) may be an effective alternative.
Methods: For this review (PROSPERO CRD42020179545) we searched databases (inception to November 1, 2020) for quantitative and qualitative studies that reported on leakage, acceptability, or safety of RMPs. Findings were summarised or combined using forest plots (random-effects meta-analysis). Potential costs and environmental savings associated with RMPs were estimated.
Results: A total of 44 studies were eligible (~14,800 participants). Most were conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC, 78%), and 20% in refugee settings. The overall quality of studies was low. RMP uptake in cohort studies ranged from 22-100% (12 studies). One Ugandan trial among schoolgirls found leakage with RMPs was lower (44.4%, n = 72) compared to cloths (78%, n = 111, p<0.001). Self-reported skin-irritation was 23.8% after 3 months among RMP-users in a Ugandan cohort in a refugee setting (n = 267), compared to 72.8% at baseline with disposable pad use. There were no objective reports on infection. Challenges with washing and changing RMP were reported in LMIC studies, due to lack of water, privacy, soap, buckets, and sanitation/drying facilities. Among 69 brands, the average price for an RMP was $8.95 (standard deviation [sd] $5.08; LMIC $2.06, n = 10, high-income countries [HIC] $10.11), with a mean estimated lifetime of 4.3 years (sd 2.3; LMIC 2.9, n = 11; HIC 4.9 years, n = 23). In 5-year cost-estimates, in LMICs, 4-25 RMPs per period would be cheaper (170-417 US$) than 9-25 single-use pads, with waste-savings of ~600-1600 single-use pads. In HICs, 4-25 RMPs would be cheaper (33-245 US$) compared to 20 single-use tampons per period, with waste-savings of ~1300 tampons.
Conclusion: RMPs are used internationally and are an effective, safe, cheaper, and environmentally friendly option for menstrual product provision by programmes. Good quality studies in this field are needed.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
![Fig 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8462722/bin/pone.0257610.g001.gif)
![Fig 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8462722/bin/pone.0257610.g002.gif)
![Fig 3](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8462722/bin/pone.0257610.g003.gif)
Similar articles
-
Menstrual cup use, leakage, acceptability, safety, and availability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet Public Health. 2019 Aug;4(8):e376-e393. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30111-2. Epub 2019 Jul 16. Lancet Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31324419 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability of menstrual products interventions for menstrual hygiene management among women and girls in Malawi.Reprod Health. 2020 Nov 23;17(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01045-z. Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 33228723 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability and performance of the menstrual cup in South Africa: a randomized crossover trial comparing the menstrual cup to tampons or sanitary pads.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Feb;24(2):151-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5021. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015. PMID: 25682816 Clinical Trial.
-
Absorbent products for urinary/faecal incontinence: a comparative evaluation of key product designs.Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jul;12(29):iii-iv, ix-185. doi: 10.3310/hta12290. Health Technol Assess. 2008. PMID: 18547500 Review.
-
Menstrual Hygiene Management and Waste Disposal in Low and Middle Income Countries-A Review of the Literature.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 15;15(11):2562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112562. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30445767 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Perceptions, Beliefs, and Experiences about the Menstrual Cycle and Menstruation among Young Women: A Qualitative Approach.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 28;12(5):560. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12050560. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38470671 Free PMC article.
-
Research priorities for improving menstrual health across the life-course in low- and middle-income countries.Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2279396. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2279396. Epub 2023 Nov 27. Glob Health Action. 2023. PMID: 38010372 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences, awareness, perceptions and attitudes of women and girls towards menstrual hygiene management and safe menstrual products in Pakistan.Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 7;11:1242169. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1242169. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37744511 Free PMC article.
-
Menstrual Hygiene Practices in Indian Tribal Females: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2023 Jul 20;15(7):e42216. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42216. eCollection 2023 Jul. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37605713 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reusable period products: use and perceptions among young people in Victoria, Australia.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Mar 11;23(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02197-3. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 36906569 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Delaney J, Lupton MJ, Toth E. The Curse. A cultural history of menstruation. Champaign, IL, USA: University of Illinois Press; 1988.
-
- Lacroix AE, Langaker MD. Physiology, Menarche. Treasure Island (FL)StatPearls; 2020. - PubMed
-
- McMahon SA, Winch PJ, Caruso BA, Obure AF, Ogutu EA, Ochari IA, et al.. ’The girl with her period is the one to hang her head’ Reflections on menstrual management among schoolgirls in rural Kenya. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2011;11:7. Epub 2011/06/18. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-11-7 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources