Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb:43:24-29.
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

The disconnected couple: intimate relationships in the context of social isolation

Affiliations
Review

The disconnected couple: intimate relationships in the context of social isolation

Benjamin B Haggerty et al. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Partners in intimate relationships, because they have each other to rely on, have generally been considered safe from the negative consequences of social isolation. Here, we question this assumption, suggesting instead that social isolation may pose a threat to couples by depriving them of the tangible and emotional support that couples are likely to need, especially when confronted by stress. After briefly reviewing theoretical frameworks relevant to this idea, this article summarizes existing research documenting (1) associations between network ties and relationship outcomes, (2) mediators of these associations, for example, support and approval, and (3) moderators of these associations, for example, relationship qualities and cultural differences. We conclude by describing a research agenda to address methodological limitations in existing research and the policy implications of this line of work.

Keywords: Intimate relationships; Marital interaction; Marital satisfaction; Marriage; Social isolation; Social networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement Nothing declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
How social isolation affects couples.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB: Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med 2010, 7, e1000316, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fuller-Iglesias HR: Social ties and psychological well-being in late life: the mediating role of relationship satisfaction. Aging Ment Health 2015, 19:1103–1112, 10.1080/13607863.2014.1003285. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kearns A, Whitley E, Tannahill C, Ellaway A: Loneliness, social relations and health and well-being in deprived communities. Psychol Health Med 2015, 20:332–344, 10.1080/13548506.2014.940354. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murray P: Most want a partner like them. Monmouth University Polling Institute; 2017. https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/monmouthpoll_us_020917/.
    1. Waite LJ, Lehrer EL: The benefits from marriage and religion in the United States: a comparative analysis. Popul Dev Rev 2003, 29:255–275, 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00255.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources