Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;58(9):e13857.
doi: 10.1111/psyp.13857. Epub 2021 Jun 6.

Group-level physiological synchrony and individual-level anxiety predict positive affective behaviors during a group decision-making task

Affiliations

Group-level physiological synchrony and individual-level anxiety predict positive affective behaviors during a group decision-making task

Ilanit Gordon et al. Psychophysiology. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Joint performance can lead to the synchronization of physiological processes among group members during a shared task. Recently, it has been shown that synchronization is indicative of subjective ratings of group processes and task performance. However, different methods have been used to quantify synchronization, and little is known about the effects of the choice of method and level of analysis (individuals, dyads, or triads) on the results. In this study, participants performed a decision-making task in groups of three while physiological signals (heart rate and electrodermal activity), positive affective behavior, and personality traits were measured. First, we investigated the effects of different levels of analysis of physiological synchrony on affective behavior. We computed synchrony measures as (a) individual contributions to group synchrony, (b) the average dyadic synchrony within a group, and (c) group-level synchrony. Second, we assessed the association between physiological synchrony and positive affective behavior. Third, we investigated the moderating effects of trait anxiety and social phobia on behavior. We discovered that the effects of physiological synchrony on positive affective behavior were particularly strong at the group level but nonsignificant at the individual and dyadic levels. Moreover, we found that heart rate and electrodermal synchronization showed opposite effects on group members' display of affective behavior. Finally, trait anxiety moderated the relationship between physiological synchrony and affective behavior, perhaps due to social uncertainty, while social phobia did not have a moderating effect. We discuss these results regarding the role of different physiological signals and task demands during joint action.

Keywords: electrodermal activity; group interactions; heart rate; interpersonal synchrony; multidimensional recurrence quantification analysis; physiological synchrony.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Three‐way interaction plot of the relation of the STAI value to smiling behavior as a function of group‐level joint BPM and joint EDA. STAI exerted an increasingly positive effect on smiling when both joint BPM and joint EDA dynamics were weak

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abney, D. H. , Paxton, A. , Dale, R. , & Kello, C. T. (2015). Movement dynamics reflect a functional role for weak coupling and role structure in dyadic problem solving. Cognitive Processing, 16, 325–332. 10.1007/s10339-015-0648-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ballard, T. , Palada, H. , Griffin, M. , & Neal, A. (2021). An integrated approach to testing dynamic, multilevel theory: Using computational models to connect theory, model, and data. Organizational Research Methods, 24, 251–284. 10.1177/1094428119881209 - DOI
    1. Bates, D. , Mächler, M. , Bolker, B. , & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, v067i01. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
    1. Behrens, F. , Snijdewint, J. , Moulder, R. G. , Prochazkova, E. , Sjak‐Shie, E. E. , Boker, S. M. , & Kret, M. E. (2019). Physiological synchrony promotes cooperative success in real‐life interactions. bioRxiv, 792416. 10.1101/792416 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brysbaert, M. , & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1, 1–20. 10.5334/joc.10 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types