Assumption of the Myths of Romantic Love: Its Relationship With Sex, Type of Sex-Affective Relationship, and Sexual Orientation
- PMID: 34095286
- PMCID: PMC8175080
- DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.621646
Assumption of the Myths of Romantic Love: Its Relationship With Sex, Type of Sex-Affective Relationship, and Sexual Orientation
Abstract
Romantic love promotes and lays the foundation for the development of hegemonic affective sex relationships, guiding the normative ways of feeling and experiencing love. This way of conceiving love is an intrinsic part of women's subordination, and it entails a greater tolerance for situations of violence in sex-affective relationships in which the exercise of asymmetric power relations between men and women is legitimized. With the current advent of the postmodern stage, a wide variety of dissident (non-heterosexual) sexual orientations with heterosexual hegemony have been given greater visibility and legitimacy, and new ways of relating to sex affectively have emerged initially opposed to traditional romantic discourse, the fundamental pillar of monogamy. The aim of the present work was to study whether these different ways of linking us and understanding affective sex relations marked a significant difference with respect to the heterosexual monogamous hegemonic model in the assumption of the mythified ideas of romantic love. Therefore, we studied the relationship between sex, sexual orientation, and the type of sex-affective relationship (monogamous or non-monogamous by consensus) in the assumption of the myths of romantic love. For this purpose, an instrument that showed appropriate psychometric properties was created, and a cross-sectional study was carried out with a sample of 1,235 people who completed a self-administered online questionnaire. The results indicated that there were no significant differences according to sex, but there were differences in sexual orientation and type of relationship. It may be concluded that a person, regardless of sex, heterosexual or homosexual, monogamous or who has never had affective sex relations, will have a significantly greater probability of assuming the myths of romantic love than a person with a sexual orientation other than heterosexual or homosexual and who is in a non-monogamous consensual relationship.
Keywords: better-half; bisexual; consensual non-monogamy; exclusivity; monogamy; polyamory.
Copyright © 2021 Cubells-Serra, Sánchez-Sicilia, Astudillo-Mendoza, Escandón-Nagel and Baeza-Rivera.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships.Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Aug;48(6):1811-1828. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1286-4. Epub 2019 Jan 3. Arch Sex Behav. 2019. PMID: 30607710
-
Desire, Familiarity, and Engagement in Polyamory: Results From a National Sample of Single Adults in the United States.Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 23;12:619640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619640. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 33833712 Free PMC article.
-
Stories Told Together: Male Narratives of Non-Monogamous Bi+ and Heterosexual Men.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 May;50(4):1461-1477. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02008-6. Epub 2021 Jun 7. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 34100146 Free PMC article.
-
What do we know about consensual non-monogamy?Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Dec;48:101468. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101468. Epub 2022 Sep 16. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36215906 Review.
-
Toward consistent reporting of sample characteristics in studies investigating the biological mechanisms of romantic love.Front Psychol. 2023 May 4;14:983419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.983419. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37213378 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Personality and Mating Orientations in Monogamy and Consensual Non-Monogamy in Young Spanish University Students.Arch Sex Behav. 2023 May;52(4):1785-1798. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02483-5. Epub 2022 Dec 5. Arch Sex Behav. 2023. PMID: 36469146
References
-
- Atencio E. E. (2017). Sexual Orientations and Perceptions of Jealousy. Doctoral dissertation, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
-
- Barcelona A. (1992). The language of romantic love in English and Spanish. Atlantis 14, 5–27.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources