Efficacy of a tight-control and treat-to-target strategy in axial spondyloarthritis: results of the open-label, pragmatic, cluster-randomised TICOSPA trial
- PMID: 33958325
- PMCID: PMC8522451
- DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219585
Efficacy of a tight-control and treat-to-target strategy in axial spondyloarthritis: results of the open-label, pragmatic, cluster-randomised TICOSPA trial
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the benefits of a tight-control/treat-to-target strategy (TC/T2T) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with those of usual care (UC).
Methods: Pragmatic, prospective, cluster-randomised, controlled, open, 1-year trial (NCT03043846). 18 centres were randomised (1:1). Patients met Axial Spondylo Arthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for axSpA, had an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥2.1, received non-optimal treatment by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and were biologic-naive.
Interventions: (1) TC/T2T: visits every 4 weeks and prespecified strategy based on treatment intensification until achieving target (ie, ASDAS <2.1); (2) UC: visits every 12 weeks and treatment at the rheumatologist's discretion.
Main outcome: Percentage of patients with a ≥30% improvement on the ASAS-Health Index (ASAS-HI). Other efficacy outcomes and adverse events were recorded. A health economic evaluation was performed.
Statistical analysis: Two-level mixed models were used to estimate efficacy outcomes. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for TC/T2T versus UC.
Results: 160 patients were included (80/group). Mean (SD) age was 37.9 (11.0) years and disease duration was 3.7 (6.2) years; 51.2% were men. ASDAS at inclusion was 3.0 (0.7), and ASAS-HI was 8.6 (3.7). ASAS-HI improved by ≥30% in 47.3% of the TC/T2T arm and in 36.1% of those receiving UC (non-significant). All secondary efficacy outcomes were more frequent in the TC/T2T arm, although not all statistically significant. Safety was similar in both arms. From a societal perspective, TC/T2T resulted in an additional 0.04 QALY, and saved €472 compared with UC.
Conclusion: TC/T2T was not significantly superior to UC for the primary outcome, while many secondary efficacy outcomes favoured it, had a similar safety profile and was favourable from a societal health economic perspective.
Trial registration number: NCT03043846.
Keywords: ankylosing; healthcare; outcome and process assessment; spondylitis; therapeutics.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Dr van Tubergen reports grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants from Pfizer, grants from UCB, grants from Biogen, grants from AbbVie, outside the submitted work. Dr van der Heijde reports personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma, outside the submitted work; and Director of Imaging Rheumatology bv. Dr van Gaalen reports grants from Stichting vrienden van Sole Mio, grants from Stichting ASAS, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants from UCB, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work. AB received a research grant to her department from AbbVie, consultation fees from Eli Lilly and Galapagos and a speakers fee from UCB, all paid to her department. Dr Van den Bosch reports personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Galapagos, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from UCB, outside the submitted work. Dr Claudepierre reports personal fees from Roche Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, grants from Roche Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, MSD, AbbVie, Lilly, Celgene, Janssen, BMS, outside the submitted work. Dr Molto reports grants from UCB during the conduct of the study; personal fees from AbbVie, grants and personal fees from UCB, personal fees from BMS, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from Lilly, outside the submitted work. Dr Gossec reports grants from Amgen, Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Galapagos, personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Biogen, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, outside the submitted work. Dr Dougados reports grants from UCB, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from AbbVie, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Lilly, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Roche, grants and personal fees from BMS, grants and personal fees from Merck, outside the submitted work. Dr Dernis, Dr Ruyssen-Witrand, Dr Lenaerts, Dr Lopez-Medina, Dr Sparsa, Dr Starmans-Kool, Dr C Webers, Dr Pouplin, Dr Soubrier and Dr Joos have nothing to declare.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8522451/bin/annrheumdis-2020-219585f01.gif)
![Figure 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8522451/bin/annrheumdis-2020-219585f02.gif)
Comment in
-
What is the optimal target for a T2T approach in axial spondyloarthritis?Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Nov;80(11):1367-1369. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220603. Epub 2021 Jun 18. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021. PMID: 34144966 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Correspondence on 'Efficacy of a tight-control and treat-to-target strategy in axial spondyloarthritis: results of the open-label, pragmatic, cluster-randomised TICOSPA trial'.Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Jul;82(7):e166. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220904. Epub 2021 Jun 29. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023. PMID: 34187774 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
Response to: 'Correspondence on 'Efficacy of a tight-control and treat-to-target strategy in axial spondyloarthritis: results of the open-label, pragmatic, cluster-randomised TICOSPA trial'' by Cai and Peng.Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Jul;82(7):e167. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220913. Epub 2021 Jun 29. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023. PMID: 34187778 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
Correspondence on "Efficacy of a tight-control and treat-to-target strategy in axial spondyloarthritis: results of the open-label, pragmatic, cluster-randomised TICOSPA trial" by Molto et al.Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Dec;82(12):e229. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221423. Epub 2021 Nov 1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023. PMID: 34725049 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
When Usual Care Is Not So Usual: Protocol Violations and Generalizability in a Treat-to-Target Strategy Trial in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 Jun 24. doi: 10.1002/acr.25387. Online ahead of print. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024. PMID: 38924366
-
Treat-to-target strategy with secukinumab as a first-line biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug compared to standard-of-care treatment in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis: protocol for a randomised open-label phase III study, AScalate.BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 30;10(9):e039059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039059. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32998926 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical performance of ASAS Health Index in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: real-world evidence from Multicenter Nationwide Registry.Rheumatol Int. 2020 Nov;40(11):1793-1801. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04680-8. Epub 2020 Aug 19. Rheumatol Int. 2020. PMID: 32814986
-
Treat-to-target in axial spondyloarthritis: gold standard or fools' gold?Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;31(4):344-348. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000625. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2019. PMID: 31090589 Review.
-
Treat to Target in Axial Spondyloarthritis: What Are the Issues?Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017 May;19(5):22. doi: 10.1007/s11926-017-0648-6. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28386759 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical value of the Patient Global Assessment with Ankylosing Spondylitis: A cross-sectional study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Apr 19;103(16):e37791. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037791. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 38640261 Free PMC article.
-
Comorbidities Burden and Implementation of the Treat-to-Target Strategy in Predicting Real-World Patient Outcomes in Spondyloarthritides.Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2023 Jul 31;34(4):581-587. doi: 10.31138/mjr.310723.cba. eCollection 2023 Dec. Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2023. PMID: 38282943 Free PMC article.
-
Axial Spondyloarthritis Treatment Recommendations and Disease Activity Monitoring in Clinical Practice: Results of an Online Survey.J Rheumatol. 2024 May 1;51(5):472-478. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0894. J Rheumatol. 2024. PMID: 38224985
-
The predictability of ASDAS on drug survival in patients with ankylosing spondylitis on biologic therapy: data from the KOBIO registry.Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2023 Oct 9;15:1759720X231201714. doi: 10.1177/1759720X231201714. eCollection 2023. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2023. PMID: 37822329 Free PMC article.
-
Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis.Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2023 Nov;19(11):724-737. doi: 10.1038/s41584-023-01034-z. Epub 2023 Oct 6. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2023. PMID: 37803079
References
-
- Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, et al. . A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index. J Rheumatol 1994;21:2286–91. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous