Performance of Fitbit Charge 3 against polysomnography in measuring sleep in adolescent boys and girls
- PMID: 33792456
- PMCID: PMC8255273
- DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2021.1903481
Performance of Fitbit Charge 3 against polysomnography in measuring sleep in adolescent boys and girls
Abstract
We evaluated the performance of Fitbit Charge 3™ (FC3), a multi-sensor commercial sleep-tracker, for measuring sleep in adolescents against gold-standard laboratory polysomnography (PSG). Single-night PSG and FC3 sleep outcomes were compared in thirty-nine adolescents (22 girls; 16-19 years), 12 of whom presented with clinical/subclinical DSM-5 insomnia symptoms (7 girls). Discrepancy analysis, Bland-Altman plots, and epoch-by-epoch analyses were used to evaluate FC3 performance. The influence of several factors potentially affecting FC3 performance (e.g., sex, age, body mass index, firmware version, and magnitude of heart rate changes between consecutive PSG epochs) was also tested. In the sample of healthy adolescents, FC3 systematically underestimated PSG total sleep time by about 11 min and sleep efficiency by 2.5%, and overestimated wake after sleep onset by 9 min. Proportional biases were detected for "light" and "deep" sleep duration, resulting in significant underestimation of these parameters for those participants having longer PSG N1+ N2 and N3 durations, respectively. No significant systematic bias was detected for sleep efficiency and sleep onset latency. Epoch-by-epoch analysis showed sleep-stage sensitivity (average proportion of PSG epochs correctly classified by the device for a given sleep stage) of 68% for wake, 78% for "light" sleep, 59% for "deep" sleep, and 69% for rapid eye movement (REM) sleep in healthy sleepers. Similar results were found in the sample of adolescents with insomnia symptoms. Body mass index was positively associated with FC3-PSG discrepancies in wake after sleep onset (R2 = .16, p = .048). The magnitude of the heart rate acceleration/deceleration between consecutive PSG epochs was an important factor affecting FC3 classifications of sleep stages. Our results are in line with a general trend in the literature, suggesting better performance for the recently introduced multi-sensor devices compared to motion-only devices, although further developments are needed to improve accuracy in sleep stage classification and wake detection. Further insight is needed to determine factors potentially affecting device performance, such as accuracy and reliability (consistency of performance over time), in different samples and conditions.
Keywords: Fitbit; Wearable sleep trackers; accuracy; adolescence; consumer sleep technology; insomnia.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
![Figure 1.](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8255273/bin/nihms-1687441-f0001.gif)
![Figure 2.](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8255273/bin/nihms-1687441-f0002.gif)
Similar articles
-
A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2™ compared with polysomnography in adults.Chronobiol Int. 2018 Apr;35(4):465-476. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2017.1413578. Epub 2017 Dec 13. Chronobiol Int. 2018. PMID: 29235907
-
Validation of Fitbit Charge 2 Sleep and Heart Rate Estimates Against Polysomnographic Measures in Shift Workers: Naturalistic Study.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 5;23(10):e26476. doi: 10.2196/26476. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34609317 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of a Consumer Sleep Wearable Device With Actigraphy and Polysomnography in Adolescents Across Sleep Opportunity Manipulations.J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Sep 15;15(9):1337-1346. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7932. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019. PMID: 31538605 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of Fitbit Charge 4, Garmin Vivosmart 4, and WHOOP Versus Polysomnography: Systematic Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 27;12:e52192. doi: 10.2196/52192. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024. PMID: 38557808 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of Portable Monitoring Devices for Diagnosing Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Update of a Systematic Review [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2004 Sep 1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2004 Sep 1. PMID: 26065047 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of a nutraceutical combination on sleep quality among people with impaired sleep: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 5;14(1):8062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58661-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38580720 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluating reliability in wearable devices for sleep staging.NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Mar 18;7(1):74. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01016-9. NPJ Digit Med. 2024. PMID: 38499793 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accuracy of 11 Wearable, Nearable, and Airable Consumer Sleep Trackers: Prospective Multicenter Validation Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Nov 2;11:e50983. doi: 10.2196/50983. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023. PMID: 37917155 Free PMC article.
-
Resident Sleep During Traditional Home Call Compared to Night Float.J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2023 Sep 21;15(2):e204-e208. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1775578. eCollection 2023 Jul. J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2023. PMID: 37744316 Free PMC article.
-
Wearable and mobile technology to characterize daily patterns of sleep, stress, presleep worry, and mood in adolescent insomnia.Sleep Health. 2023 Feb;9(1):108-116. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2022.11.006. Epub 2022 Dec 24. Sleep Health. 2023. PMID: 36567194 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM 5. 5th. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Publishing.
-
- Berry RB, Brooks R, Gamaldo CE, Harding SM, Lloyd RM, Marcus CL, Vaughn B V. 2020. The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: Rules, terminology and technical specifications version 2.6. Darien (IL): American Academy of Sleep Medicine.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources