Validation of estimated glycaemic index and glycaemic load, stratified by race, in the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2)
- PMID: 33413707
- PMCID: PMC10195332
- DOI: 10.1017/S1368980020003778
Validation of estimated glycaemic index and glycaemic load, stratified by race, in the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2)
Abstract
Objective: Few studies have validated FFQ estimates of dietary glycaemic index (GI) and load (GL). We investigated how well our estimates of overall GI and GL from FFQs correlate with estimates from repeated 24 h recall data to validate overall GI and GL in the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2).
Design: The AHS-2 is a prospective population-based cohort of 95 873 Seventh-day Adventist adult church members enrolled from 2002 to 2007 to investigate diet, cancer and mortality.
Setting: A 204-item FFQ was used to assess race- and gender-specific validity of GI and GL and 24 h recall data, from the calibration sub-study, were used as the reference.
Participants: The 734 calibration study participants were randomly selected by church and included approximately equal numbers of blacks and whites but were otherwise similar to the whole cohort with respect to gender, age, education and vegetarian status.
Results: The deattenuated correlation coefficients for overall GI ranged from 0·19 (95 % CI -0·06, 0·53) in black men to 0·46 (95 % CI 0·40, 0·60) in black women, with both non-black men and women falling between those values (0·45 (95 % CI 0·35, 0·65) and 0·38 (95 % CI 0·27, 0·57), respectively). GL correlations were somewhat higher for all study participants. When looking at the entire cohort, the deattenuated validity correlation value for overall GI was (r 0·38, 95 % CI 0·36, 0·47) and GL was (r 0·39, 95 % CI 0·34, 0·49).
Conclusions: Our findings support the cautious use of our FFQ in epidemiological studies when assessing associations of overall GI and GL with disease risk. However, observed differences by race should be considered when interpreting results.
Keywords: Adventist Health Study-2; Glycaemic index; Glycaemic load; Validation.
Similar articles
-
Associations of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load with Cardiovascular Disease: Updated Evidence from Meta-analysis and Cohort Studies.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Mar;24(3):141-161. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01635-2. Epub 2022 Feb 4. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022. PMID: 35119682 Review.
-
The Glycaemic Index-Food-Frequency Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire Designed to Estimate the Dietary Intake of Glycaemic Index and Glycaemic Load: An Effort by the PREVIEW Consortium.Nutrients. 2018 Dec 20;11(1):13. doi: 10.3390/nu11010013. Nutrients. 2018. PMID: 30577531 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of nutrient intake using an FFQ and repeated 24 h recalls in black and white subjects of the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2).Public Health Nutr. 2010 Jun;13(6):812-9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009992072. Epub 2009 Dec 8. Public Health Nutr. 2010. PMID: 19968897 Free PMC article.
-
Reproducibility and relative validity of dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load assessed by the food-frequency questionnaire used in the Dutch cohorts of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.Br J Nutr. 2009 Aug;102(4):601-4. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508207269. Epub 2009 Mar 23. Br J Nutr. 2009. PMID: 19302718
-
Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk--a meta-analysis of observational studies.Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Mar;87(3):627-37. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.3.627. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008. PMID: 18326601 Review.
References
-
- Barclay A, Petocz P, McMillan-Price J et al. (2008) Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk—a meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 627–637. - PubMed
-
- Choi Y, Giovannucci E & Lee J (2012) Glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of diabetes-related cancers: a meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 108, 1934–1947. - PubMed
-
- Gnagnarella P, Gandini S, La Vecchia C et al. (2008) Glycemic index, glycemic load, and cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 1793–1801. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources