Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;12(3):e1551.
doi: 10.1002/wcs.1551. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

Infants' performance in the indirect false belief tasks: A second-person interpretation

Pamela Barone  1   2 , Antoni Gomila  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Infants' performance in the indirect false belief tasks: A second-person interpretation

Pamela Barone et al. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2021 May.

Abstract

Research in the last 15 years has challenged the idea that false belief attribution develops at 4 years of age. Studies with indirect false belief tasks contend to provide evidence of false belief attribution in the second year of life. We review the literature on indirect false belief tasks carried out in infants using looking and active helping paradigms. Although the results are heterogeneous and not conclusive, such tasks appear to capture a real effect. However, it is misleading to call them "false belief" tasks, as it is possible to pass them without making any false belief attribution. Infants need to keep track of the object's and agent's positions, trajectories, and focus of attention, given an intentional understanding of the agent, to pass these new tasks. We, therefore, argue that the evidence can be better explained in terms of second-person attributions, which are transparent, extensional, nonpropositional, reciprocally contingent, and implicit. Second-person attributions can also account for primates' mentalizing abilities, as revealed by similar indirect tasks. This article is categorized under: Cognitive Biology > Cognitive Development Philosophy > Foundations of Cognitive Science Cognitive Biology > Evolutionary Roots of Cognition.

Keywords: false belief; false belief attribution; indirect false belief tasks; intentional understanding; mentalizing; second-person attribution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Apperly, I. A. , & Butterfill, S. A. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief‐like states? Psychological Review, 116(4), 953–970. 10.1037/a0016923 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object permanence in 3½‐and 4½‐month‐old infants. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 655–664. 10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.655 - DOI
    1. Bard, K. A. , & Leavens, D. A. (2009). Socio‐emotional factors in the development of joint attention in human and ape infants. In Röska‐Hardy L. & Neumann‐Held E. M. (Eds.), Learning from animals? Examining the nature of human uniqueness (pp. 89–104). London, England: Psychology Press.
    1. Barone, P. , Bedia, M. G. , & Gomila, A. (2020). A minimal turing test: Reciprocal sensorimotor contingencies for interaction detection. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14(March), 1–19. 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00102 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barone, P. , Corradi, G. , & Gomila, A. (2019). Infants' performance in spontaneous‐response false belief tasks: A review and meta‐analysis. Infant Behavior & Development, 57, 101350. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.101350 - DOI - PubMed