Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 8;9(4):920-923.
doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00085.

Developmental and family considerations in internet use disorder taxonomy. Commentary on: How to overcome taxonomical problems in the study of Internet use disorders and what to do with "smartphone addiction"? (Montag et al., 2020)

Dillon T Browne  1 , Shealyn S May  1 , Laura Colucci  1 , Hans-Jurgen Rumpf  2
Affiliations

Developmental and family considerations in internet use disorder taxonomy. Commentary on: How to overcome taxonomical problems in the study of Internet use disorders and what to do with "smartphone addiction"? (Montag et al., 2020)

Dillon T Browne et al. J Behav Addict. .

Abstract

Montag, Wegmann, Sariyska, Demetrovics, and Brand (2019) propose an important framework surrounding the taxonomy of problematic internet usage, with particular applications to disentangling the role of mobile and other handheld devices versus stationary platforms. This is a critical contribution, as organizational frameworks have begun to move past "whether" there is disordered internet use, and towards better understanding the complex and multifaceted ways in which internet usage can be related to psychological maladjustment. In the present commentary, we encourage authors to extend this framework by incorporating developmental complexities. Montag and colleagues' (2019) contribution is discussed with reference to children and families, including: (1) the conceptualization of problematic internet usage and associated behaviors across the early years, (2) the types of internet use and devices that are most salient for young users, (3) the embedding of children's internet consumption within the context of a broader pattern of family media usage, and (4) the construct of behavioral addictions in pediatric populations. Recommendations for science and practice are briefly discussed.

Keywords: children; development; family; internet use disorder; taxonomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics (2018, May 1). Children and media tips from the American Academy of Pediatrics. American Academy of Pediatrics. https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/news-features-and....
    1. Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Jones, L. L. (2009). Executive functions after age 5: Changes and correlates. Developmental Review, 29(3), 180–200. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Browne, D. T., May, S., Hurst-Della Pietra, P., Christakis, D., Asamoah, T., Hale, L., et al. (2019). From ‘screen time’ to the digital level of analysis: Protocol for a scoping review of digital media use in children and adolescents. BMJ Open, 9(11). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Browne, D. T., Plamondon, A., Prime, H., Puente‐Duran, S., & Wade, M. (2015). Cumulative risk and developmental health: An argument for the importance of a family‐wide science. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(4), 397–407. - PubMed
    1. Browne, D., Thompson, D. A., & Madigan, S. (2020). Digital media use in children: Clinical vs scientific responsibilities. JAMA Pediatrics, 174(2), 111–112. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources