Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats
- PMID: 33108399
- PMCID: PMC7591058
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241344
Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats
Abstract
It is now widely agreed that a positive affective state is a crucial component of animal well-being. The judgment bias test represents a widespread tool used to assess animals' optimistic/pessimistic attitude and to evaluate their emotional state and welfare. Judgment bias tests have been used several times with dogs (Canis familiaris), in most cases using a spatial test with a bowl placed in ambiguous positions located between a relatively positive trained location (P) which contains a baited bowl and a relatively negative trained location (N) which contains an empty bowl. The latency to approach the bowl in the ambiguous locations is an indicator of the dog's expectation of a positive/negative outcome. However, results from such tests are often inconclusive. For the present study, the judgment bias test performance of 51 shelter dogs and 40 pet dogs was thoroughly analysed. A pattern emerged with shelter dogs behaving in a more pessimistic-like way than pet dogs. However, this difference between the two populations was detected only when analysing the raw latencies to reach the locations and not the more commonly applied adjusted score (i.e. average latency values). Furthermore, several methodological caveats were found. First of all, a non-negligible percentage of dogs did not pass the training phase, possibly due to the experimental paradigm not being fully suited for this species. Second, results showed a high intra-dog variability in response to the trained locations, i.e. the dogs' responses were not consistent throughout the test, suggesting that animals may not have fully learned the association between locations and their outcomes. Third, dogs did not always behave differently towards adjacent locations, raising doubts about the animals' ability to discriminate between locations. Finally, a potential influence of the researcher's presence on dogs' performance emerged from analyses. The implications of these findings and potential solutions are discussed.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The effect of repeated testing on judgement bias in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):477-489. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01689-3. Epub 2022 Sep 12. Anim Cogn. 2023. PMID: 36094748 Free PMC article.
-
A promising novel judgement bias test to evaluate affective states in dogs (Canis familiaris).Anim Cogn. 2022 Aug;25(4):837-852. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01596-z. Epub 2022 Jan 4. Anim Cogn. 2022. PMID: 34982301
-
Personality traits affecting judgement bias task performance in dogs (Canis familiaris).Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 27;8(1):6660. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25224-y. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29703989 Free PMC article.
-
Optimism, pessimism and judgement bias in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Nov;118:3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 16. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020. PMID: 32682742 Review.
-
Agility and search and rescue training differently affects pet dogs' behaviour in socio-cognitive tasks.Behav Processes. 2009 Jul;81(3):416-22. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.03.015. Behav Processes. 2009. PMID: 19520242 Review.
Cited by
-
The Role of Life History and Familiarity in Performance of Working and Non-Working Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) in a Point-Following Task.Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;14(4):573. doi: 10.3390/ani14040573. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38396541 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of repeated testing on judgement bias in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):477-489. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01689-3. Epub 2022 Sep 12. Anim Cogn. 2023. PMID: 36094748 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mendl M, Burman OHP, Parker RMA, Paul ES. Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2009;118: 161–181. 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.023 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical