Complicity in Harm Reduction
- PMID: 33048314
- DOI: 10.1007/s10728-020-00407-9
Complicity in Harm Reduction
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Complicity in Harm Reduction.Health Care Anal. 2020 Dec;28(4):434. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00414-w. Epub 2020 Nov 3. Health Care Anal. 2020. PMID: 33140221
Abstract
At first glance, it seems difficult to object to any program that merits the label "harm reduction." If harm is bad, as everyone recognizes, then surely reducing it is good. What's the problem? The problem, we submit, is twofold. First, there's more to "harm reduction," as that term is typically used, than simply the reduction of harm. Some of the wariness about harm-reduction programs may result from the nebulous "more." Thus, part of our task is to provide a clear definition of harm reduction. Next, we turn to a second problem: a worry about complicity. Those who object to harm reduction programs fear that participation in such programs would make them complicit in activities they deem immoral. In this paper we argue that this fear is largely unwarranted. We use supervised injection sites (SISs)-safe spaces for the use of risky drugs-as our paradigmatic case of harm reduction. These SISs are generally offered in the hope of reducing harm to both the drug user and the public. For this reason, our analysis focuses on complicity in harm. We draw upon the work of Gregory Mellema as our framework. Mellema offers three ways one can be complicit in harm caused by another: by enabling, facilitating or condoning it. We argue that one who operates an SIS is not complicit in any of these ways, while also laying out the conditions that must be met if one is to argue that harm reduction entails complicity in non-consequentialist wrongdoing.
Keywords: Complicity; Condoning harm; Enabling harm; Facilitating harm; Harm reduction; Supervised injection site.
Similar articles
-
Disgust or Dignity? The Moral Basis of Harm Reduction.Health Care Anal. 2020 Dec;28(4):343-351. doi: 10.1007/s10728-020-00412-y. Epub 2020 Oct 24. Health Care Anal. 2020. PMID: 33098488
-
Supervised injection services: what has been demonstrated? A systematic literature review.Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Dec 1;145:48-68. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Oct 23. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014. PMID: 25456324 Review.
-
Weight(s) of complicity.J Med Ethics. 2019 Jan;45(1):69-70. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104958. Epub 2018 Jul 17. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30018146
-
Students as effective harm reductionists and needle exchange organizers.Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017 Mar 17;12(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13011-017-0099-0. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017. PMID: 28302153 Free PMC article.
-
Between Emergency Department Visits: The Role of Harm Reduction Programs in Mitigating the Harms Associated With Injection Drug Use.Ann Emerg Med. 2021 May;77(5):479-492. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.11.008. Epub 2021 Feb 10. Ann Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 33579588 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous