Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in Tunisia: main characteristics and detailed comparison with ankylosing spondylitis
- PMID: 32974836
- DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05415-7
Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in Tunisia: main characteristics and detailed comparison with ankylosing spondylitis
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the present study is to compare the clinical features, disease activity, and physical impairment between non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis in Tunisian patients.
Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted in a single rheumatology center in Tunisia. Patients with axial spondyloarthritis fulfilling the 2009 ASAS criteria were included. The various spondyloarthritis-related variables were compared between non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. p Values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results: Among 200 patients with axial spondyloarthritis, 40 had non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and 160 had ankylosing spondylitis. The non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis patients were more frequently female, were younger, and had shorter disease duration. Patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis experienced enthesitis more frequently compared with ankylosing spondylitis patients. Psoriasis was more frequent in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis group, while inflammatory bowel disease was more frequent in ankylosing spondylitis group. The C-reactive protein level and functional score were significantly higher in patients with ankylosing spondylitis compared with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were offered significantly more often to the ankylosing spondylitis group. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in other spondyloarthritis parameters.
Conclusion: The non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis is characterized mainly by a marked female prevalence, a higher enthesitis prevalence, and a better physical function.
Key points: • Patients with nr-axSpA in Tunisia are more frequently female and have shorter disease duration compared with those with AS. • Peripheral manifestations were similar between nr-axSpA and AS patients except for enthesitis which were more frequent within nr-axSpA patients. • The disease activity is similar between the 2 groups of axSpA but the physical function is better within nr-axSpA patients.
Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis; Clinical features; Disease activity; Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis; Physical function.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) from a single rheumatology clinic in New Delhi.Int J Rheum Dis. 2015 Sep;18(7):736-41. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12579. Epub 2015 Jul 14. Int J Rheum Dis. 2015. PMID: 26172961
-
Cross-sectional study of patients with axial spondyloarthritis fulfilling imaging arm of ASAS classification criteria: baseline clinical characteristics and subset differences in a single-centre cohort.BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 2;9(4):e024713. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024713. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30944131 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing symptoms, treatment patterns, and quality of life of ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis patients in the USA: findings from a patient and rheumatologist Survey.Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Aug;40(8):3161-3167. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05642-6. Epub 2021 Feb 20. Clin Rheumatol. 2021. PMID: 33611647 Free PMC article.
-
The term 'non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis' is much more important to classify than to diagnose patients with axial spondyloarthritis.Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 May;75(5):791-4. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208852. Epub 2016 Jan 14. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016. PMID: 26768406 Review.
-
Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.Mod Rheumatol. 2021 Mar;31(2):277-282. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1830512. Epub 2020 Oct 12. Mod Rheumatol. 2021. PMID: 32996809 Review.
Cited by
-
Worldwide Differences in Clinical Phenotype of Axial Spondyloarthritis.Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2021 Sep 29;23(10):76. doi: 10.1007/s11926-021-01043-5. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2021. PMID: 34586533 Review.
References
-
- Sieper J, Hu X, Black CM, Grootscholten K, van den Broek RWM, Kachroo S (2017) Systematic review of clinical, humanistic, and economic outcome comparisons between radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 46(6):746–753 - DOI
-
- Deodhar A, Reveille JD, van den Bosch F, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, Caplan L, Clegg DO, Colbert RA, Gensler LS, van der Heijde D, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Inman RD, Maksymowych WP, Mease PJ, Raychaudhuri S, Reimold A, Rudwaleit M, Sieper J, Weisman MH, Landewé RBM (2014) The concept of axial spondyloarthritis: joint statement of the spondyloarthritis research and treatment network and the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society in response to the US Food and Drug Administration’s comments and concerns. Arthritis Rheumatol Hoboken NJ 66(10):2649–2656 - DOI
-
- Braun J, Baraliakos X, Kiltz U, Heldmann F, Sieper J (2015) Classification and diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis--what is the clinically relevant difference? J Rheumatol 42(1):31–38 - DOI
-
- Poddubnyy D, Sieper J (2014) Similarities and differences between nonradiographic and radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a clinical, epidemiological and therapeutic assessment. Curr Opin Rheumatol 26(4):377–383 - DOI
-
- Zhao SS, Ermann J, Xu C, Lyu H, Tedeschi SK, Liao KP, Yoshida K, Moots RJ, Goodson NJ, Solomon DH (2019) Comparison of comorbidities and treatment between ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis in the United States. Rheumatol Oxf Engl 58(11):2025–2030 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials