Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr;45(4):1057-1064.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04806-4. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

Fractures of the acetabulum: from yesterday to tomorrow

Matej Cimerman  1 , Anže Kristan  2 , Marko Jug  2 , Matevž Tomaževič  2
Affiliations
Review

Fractures of the acetabulum: from yesterday to tomorrow

Matej Cimerman et al. Int Orthop. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this article is to present history, state of the art, and future trends in the treatment of acetabular fractures.

Methods: Review of recent and historical literature.

Results: Acetabular fractures are difficult to treat. The first descriptions of this injury already appeared in ancient Greek history, but intensive development started in the second half of the twentieth century after Judet and Letournel's seminal work. Their classification is still the gold standard today. It is actually a pre-operative planning system and is used to determine the most appropriate surgical approach. The therapy of choice for dislocated fractures is open reduction and internal fixation. Recent modern techniques based on high-tech computerized planning systems and 3D printing have been successfully integrated into orthopaedic trauma practice.

Conclusion: There is no ideal surgical approach for acetabulum fracture treatment, so new approaches have been developed in recent decades. The best outcome series have shown good or excellent results, between 70 and 80%.

Keywords: Acetabulum; Approaches; Fracture; History; Planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Process of 3D planning: a comminuted anterior column fracture of the acetabulum in a 65-year-old male, b fracture segmentation using pre-operative planning software, c a reduced size 3D-printed model enables visual and tactile understanding, d virtual reduction and individual designed shape of the plate, e, f individual designed 3D-printed plastic plates according to virtually reduced fracture serves as a template to contour reconstruction plates, g result 3 years after open reduction and internal fixation (the Pararectus surgical approach was used)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Laird A, Keating JF. Acetabular fractures: a 16-year prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:969–973. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.16017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ziran N, Soles GLS, Matta JM. Outcomes after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures: a review. Patient Saf Surg. 2019;13:16. doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0196-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Homer KB. The Iliad, Reissue edition. New York: Penguin Classics; 1998.
    1. Pearson JR, Hargadon EJ. Fractures of the pelvis involving the floor of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1962;44-B:550–561. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.44B3.550. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prevezas N. Evolution of pelvic and acetabular surgery from ancient to modern times. Injury. 2007;38:397–409. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.035. - DOI - PubMed