Retroperitoneal Versus Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Multicenter Matched-pair Analysis
- PMID: 32912841
- DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.012
Retroperitoneal Versus Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Multicenter Matched-pair Analysis
Abstract
Background: With increasing acceptance of robotic partial nephrectomy over the last decade, there is an ongoing discussion about the transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal access.
Objective: To report outcomes after transperitoneal (TRPN) versus retroperitoneal (RRPN) robotic partial nephrectomy.
Design, setting, and participants: A total of 754 patients were identified from the databases of three high-volume centers who underwent either TRPN (n = 551) or RRPN (n = 203).
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Perioperative data were evaluated retrospectively. A propensity score matched-pair analysis was performed with the following variables: grade of renal insufficiency, age, body mass index, tumor diameter, and preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) score with a subsequent subgroup analysis for tumor location. For quality outcomes, the margin, ischemia, and complications (MIC) criteria were used (negative margins, ischemia time <20 min, and no major complications). Statistical analyses included chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests.
Results and limitations: In all, 176 patients could be matched in each group. The median tumor diameter was 28 mm with a PADUA score of 9. In 11% of RRPN versus 44% of TRPN cases, an anterior tumor location was found, and in 55% versus 30%, a posterior lesion was found (p < 0.001). Operative time (119 vs 139 min, p < 0.001) and warm ischemia time (9 vs 10 min, p = 0.003) were significantly shorter for RRPN. No significant differences were observed between intra- and postoperative complication rates, with 8% major complications in TRPN versus 3% in RRPN (p = 0.06). The MIC criteria were achieved in 90% in the RRPN versus 88% in the TRPN group, without differences for tumor location.
Conclusions: Significant differences between TRPN and RRPN could be found for intraoperative time, while complication rates and quality outcomes were comparable. RRPN can also be a considerable alternative for anterior tumors.
Patient summary: In this study, we demonstrate that robotic partial nephrectomy is feasible with either a transperitoneal or a retroperitoneal surgical access. The posterior approach can also be used for anterior renal tumors and may result in shorter operative time.
Keywords: Renal mass; Retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy; Robotic partial nephrectomy; Robotic surgery; Transperitoneal partial nephrectomy.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for Pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes.World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1721-1728. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2062-0. Epub 2017 Jun 27. World J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28656359
-
Retroperitoneal vs. transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter propensity-score matching analysis (PADORA Study - UroCCR n° 68).Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2023 Aug;75(4):434-442. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05346-6. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2023. PMID: 37530660
-
Comparison by Pentafecta Criteria of Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Large Renal Tumors.J Endourol. 2020 Feb;34(2):175-183. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0410. Epub 2019 Nov 20. J Endourol. 2020. PMID: 31621405
-
A comparison of perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review.J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2563-2574. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01685-w. Epub 2023 Aug 18. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 37596485 Review.
-
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies Reporting Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy.J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):893-909. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0351. Epub 2017 Mar 29. J Endourol. 2017. PMID: 27305835 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of lateral flank approach and low anterior access for single port (SP) retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: an analysis from the single port advanced research consortium (SPARC).J Robot Surg. 2024 May 18;18(1):216. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01969-9. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38761306
-
Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal versus retraperitoneal partial nephrectomy for posterior-lateral renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 29;18(1):186. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01963-1. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38683492
-
Robot-assisted single-port retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy with a novel purpose-built single-port robotic system with deformable surgical instruments.World J Urol. 2024 Mar 13;42(1):134. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04827-3. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 38478100 Free PMC article.
-
Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World J Urol. 2024 Feb 15;42(1):83. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04796-7. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 38358565
-
Robotic transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for anterior renal mass nephron-sparing surgery.J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 14;18(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01798-2. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38353825 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources