Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;40(3):550-563.
doi: 10.1002/etc.4863. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

Recent US State and Federal Drinking Water Guidelines for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances

Affiliations
Review

Recent US State and Federal Drinking Water Guidelines for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances

Gloria B Post. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a class of synthetic chemicals produced for over 70 years, are of increasing concern because of their widespread environmental presence, extreme persistence, bioaccumulative nature, and evidence for health effects from environmentally relevant exposures. In 2016, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) established nonregulatory drinking water Health Advisories of 70 ng/L for individual and total concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), the 8-carbon perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) that are the most thoroughly studied PFAS. As of May 2020, 9 US states had concluded that the USEPA Health Advisories are insufficiently protective and developed more stringent PFOA and PFOS guidelines. In addition, 10 states had developed guidelines for other PFAS, primarily PFAAs. This Critical Review discusses the scientific basis for state and USEPA drinking water guidelines for PFOA and PFOS; the same principles apply to guidelines for other PFAS. Similarities and differences among guidelines arise from both toxicity and exposure considerations. The approximately 4-fold range among state guidelines (8-35 ng/L for PFOA, 10-40 ng/L for PFOS) is not large or unexpected for guidelines developed by different scientists at different time points, especially when compared with older USEPA and state guidelines that were generally several orders of magnitude higher. Additional state guidelines for PFOA, PFOS, and other PFAS are expected to become available. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:560-563. © 2020 SETAC.

Keywords: Drinking water; PFAS; PFOA; PFOS; Risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2018. Toxicological profile for perfluoroalkyls. Draft for Public Comment. Atlanta, GA, USA.
    1. Association of State Drinking Water Administrators. 2019. Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Regulatory Development Process. Arlington, VA, USA. [cited 2020 September 5]. Available from: https://www.asdwa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ASDWA-SDWA-Regulatory-D...
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019. Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. Updated Tables, January 2019, Volume One. Atlanta, GA, USA.
    1. Dong G-H, Liu M-M, Wang D, Zheng L, Liang Z-F, Jin Y-H. 2011. Sub-chronic effect of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) on the balance of type 1 and type 2 cytokine in adult C57BL6 mice. Arch Toxicol 85:1235-1244.
    1. Dong G-H, Zhang Y-H, Zheng L, Liu W, Jin Y-H, He Q-C. 2009. Chronic effects of perfluorooctanesulfonate exposure on immunotoxicity in adult male C57BL/6 mice. Arch Toxicol 83:805-815.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources