Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 4;15(8):e0232384.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232384. eCollection 2020.

Socio-ecological network structures from process graphs

Affiliations

Socio-ecological network structures from process graphs

Angelyn Lao et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

We propose a process graph (P-graph) approach to develop ecosystem networks from knowledge of the properties of the component species. Originally developed as a process engineering tool for designing industrial plants, the P-graph framework has key advantages over conventional ecological network analysis techniques based on input-output models. A P-graph is a bipartite graph consisting of two types of nodes, which we propose to represent components of an ecosystem. Compartments within ecosystems (e.g., organism species) are represented by one class of nodes, while the roles or functions that they play relative to other compartments are represented by a second class of nodes. This bipartite graph representation enables a powerful, unambiguous representation of relationships among ecosystem compartments, which can come in tangible (e.g., mass flow in predation) or intangible form (e.g., symbiosis). For example, within a P-graph, the distinct roles of bees as pollinators for some plants and as prey for some animals can be explicitly represented, which would not otherwise be possible using conventional ecological network analysis. After a discussion of the mapping of ecosystems into P-graph, we also discuss how this framework can be used to guide understanding of complex networks that exist in nature. Two component algorithms of P-graph, namely maximal structure generation (MSG) and solution structure generation (SSG), are shown to be particularly useful for ecological network analysis. These algorithms enable candidate ecosystem networks to be deduced based on current scientific knowledge on the individual ecosystem components. This method can be used to determine the (a) effects of loss of specific ecosystem compartments due to extinction, (b) potential efficacy of ecosystem reconstruction efforts, and (c) maximum sustainable exploitation of human ecosystem services by humans. We illustrate the use of P-graph for the analysis of ecosystem compartment loss using a small-scale stylized case study, and further propose a new criticality index that can be easily derived from SSG results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. P-graph representation of the process structure (lifted from [24]).
Fig 2
Fig 2. The flow of energy through a simple ecosystem.
The energy flow from the sun is taken up by plants, some of which are eaten by herbivores, which, in turn, are eaten by carnivores. Part of the energy flows to the outside of the system.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Local interactions of the ecosystem components.
The ecosystem functional units presented here also corresponds to those listed in Table 2. It includes Plant1 (A), Plant2 (B), Plant3 (C), Carnivore (D), Soil_microbes (E), Herbivore1(F), and Herbivore2 (G).
Fig 4
Fig 4. P-graph of the socio-ecological system.
(A) Socio-ecological P-graph representing the union of the ecosystem functional units in Fig 3. This represents Structure S1, the maximal and most redundant structure in Table 2. (B) Box diagram of the extended socio-ecological system illustrated in (A).
Fig 5
Fig 5. Minimal structure generated from the P-graph illustrated in Fig 4.
The 20 structures generated from P-graph can be found in S1 Fig. (A) Structure S10 is an intermediate structure between the maximal structure (S1) and the minimal structure (S20). (B) The minimal structure is Structure S20 in Table 2, it does not need Plant1, Plant2, Herbivore2, and Carnivore to provide the necessary service.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hannon B. The structure of ecosystems. J Theor Bio. 1973;41:535–46. 10.1016/0022-5193(73)90060-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Finn JT. Measures of ecosystem structure and function derived from analysis of flows. J Theor Bio. 1976. February 1;56(2):363–80. 10.1016/S0022-5193(76)80080-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poisot T, Stouffer DB, Kéfi S. Describe, understand and predict: why do we need networks in ecology?. Funct Ecol. 2016. December;30(12):1878–82. 10.1111/1365-2435.12799 - DOI
    1. Bodin Ö, Alexander SM, Baggio J, Barnes ML, Berardo R, Cumming GS, et al. Improving network approaches to the study of complex social-ecological interdependencies. Nat Sustain. 2019. July;2(7):551–9. 10.1038/s41893-019-0308-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jordán F, Pereira J, Ortiz M. Mesoscale network properties in ecological system models. Curr Opin Syst Biol. 2019. February 1;13:122–8. 10.1016/j.coisb.2018.12.004 - DOI

Publication types

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Pázmány Péter Catholic University Central Funds Program to HC, which allowed for the conduct of discussions among the authors of this manuscript. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.