Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 30:23:80-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.05.007. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing

Affiliations

Evaluating single-institution resource costs of consolidative radiotherapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer using time-driven activity-based costing

Todd A Pezzi et al. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Consolidative radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve overall survival in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as demonstrated by a growing number of prospective trials.

Objective: We quantified the costs of delivery of consolidative RT for common clinical pathways associated with treating oligometastatic NSCLC, by applying time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) methodology.

Methods: Full cycle costs were evaluated for 4 consolidative treatment regimens: (Regimen #1) 10-fraction 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) as palliation of a distant site; (#2) 15-fraction intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) to the primary thoracic disease; (#3) 15-fraction IMRT to the primary plus 4-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to a single oligometastatic site; and (#4) 15-fraction IMRT to the primary plus two courses of 4-fraction SABR for two oligometastatic sites.

Results: For each of the four treatment regimens, personnel represented a greater proportion of total cost when compared with equipment, totaling 61.0%, 65.9%, 66.2%, and 66.4% of the total cost of each care cycle, respectively. In total, a 10-fraction regimen of 3D-CRT to a distant site represented just 37.2% of the total cost of the most expensive course. Compared to total costs for 15-fraction IMRT alone, each additional sequential course of 4-fraction SABR imparted a cost increase of 43%.

Conclusion: This analysis uses TDABC to estimate the relative internal costs of various RT strategies associated with treating oligometastatic NSCLC. This methodology will become increasingly relevant to each organization in context of the anticipated mandate of alternative/bundled payment models for radiation oncology by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Keywords: APM; NSCLC; Oligometastasis; Radiation; TDABC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pie charts displaying the relative personnel costs involved for each treatment regimen. Note: Area of each pie chart is proportional to the total personnel cost of each treatment regimen. A = 10fx 3DCRT, B = 15fx IMRT, C = 15fx IMRT & 4fx SABR, D = 15fx IMRT & 4fx SABR (x2). Abbreviations: MD = Physician, APP = Mid-Level Provider, RN = Registered Nurse, PSC = Patient scheduling coordinator, Dosi = Dosimetrist, RTT = Radiation Therapist, MA = Medical Assistant, IMRT = intensity modulated radiation therapy, SABR = Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy, fx = fraction.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bar chart displaying the breakdown of the relative costs of each of the major and minor steps involved in each treatment regimen. Note: Percentages in each cell are relative to the total cost of Regimen #4. Abbreviations: P = Personnel cost, EQU = Equipment cost, IMRT = intensity modulated radiation therapy, SABR = Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy, fx = fraction, CT = Computed tomography, Linac = Linear Accelerator.

Similar articles

References

    1. Gomez D., Blumenschein G.R., Lee J.J. Local consolidative therapy versus maintenance therapy or observation for patients with oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without progression after first-line systemic therapy: a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(12):1672–1682. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30532-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iyengar P., Wardak Z., Gerber D.E. Consolidative Radiotherapy for Limited Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017;4(1) doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3501. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Palma D.A., Olson R., Harrow S. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus standard of care palliative treatment in patients with oligometastatic cancers (SABR-COMET): a randomised, phase 2, open-label trial. Lancet. 2019;6736(18):1–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32487-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oligometastatic Disease. US National Library of Medicine. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=oligometastatic&cntry=.... Published 2019.
    1. Beriwal S., Chino J. Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing in Oncology: A Step in the Right Direction. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2018;100(1):95–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.10.017. - DOI - PubMed