Anogenital distance in adult women is a strong marker of endometriosis: results of a prospective study with laparoscopic and histological findings
- PMID: 32529050
- PMCID: PMC7275635
- DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa023
Anogenital distance in adult women is a strong marker of endometriosis: results of a prospective study with laparoscopic and histological findings
Abstract
Study question: Could anogenital distance (AGD) be a non-invasive marker of endometriosis and correlated to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine revised score (r-ASRM) and ENZIAN classifications?
Summary answer: Surgically and histologically proven endometriosis is associated with a short AGD in women of reproductive age but not correlated either to the severity or to the location of the disease.
What is known already: AGD is a marker of intrauterine androgen exposure and exposure to oestrogen-like chemicals such as phthalates. Moreover, exposure to endocrine disruptors, such as organochlorine chemicals, is associated with endometriosis. It has been suggested that a short AGD in women is associated with an increased risk of endometriosis based on clinical and ultrasound exams.
Study design size duration: A prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2018 to June 2019 in a tertiary-care centre including 168 adult women undergoing pelvic surgery.
Participants/materials setting methods: Of the 168 women included, 98 patients had endometriosis (endometriosis group) and 70 did not (non-endometriosis group). An operator (not the surgeon) measured the distance from the clitoral surface to the anus (AGD-AC) and from the posterior fourchette to the anus (AGD-AF) before surgery using a millimetre accuracy ruler. Endometriosis was diagnosed on exploration of the abdominopelvic cavity, and the r-ASRM and ENZIAN scores were calculated. All removed tissues underwent pathological examination.
Main results and the role of chance: Mean (±SD) AGD-AF measurements were 21.5 mm (±6.4) and 32.3 mm (±8.1), and average AGD-AC measurements were 100.9 mm (±20.6) and 83.8 mm (±12.9) in the endometriosis and non-endometriosis groups (P < 0.001), respectively. Mean AGD-AF and AGD-AC measurements were not related to r-ASRM stage (P = 0.73 and 0.80, respectively) or ENZIAN score (P = 0.62 and 0.21, respectively). AGD-AF had a better predictive value than AGD-AC for discriminating the presence of endometriosis (AUC = 0.840 (95% CI 0.782-0.898) and 0.756 (95% CI 0.684-0.828)), respectively. For AGD-AF, an optimal cut-off of 20 mm had a specificity of 0.986 (95% CI 0.923-0.999), sensitivity of 0.306 (95% CI 26.1-31.6) and positive predictive value of 0.969 (95% CI 0.826-0.998). In multivariable analysis, the diagnosis of endometriosis was the only variable independently associated with the AGD-AF (β = -9.66 mm 95% CI -12.20--7.12), P < 0.001).
Limitations reasons for caution: The sample size was relatively small with a high proportion of patients with colorectal endometriosis reflecting the activity of an expert centre. Furthermore, we did not include adolescents and the AGD-AF measurement could be particularly relevant in this population.
Wider implications of the findings: The measurement of AGD could be a useful non-invasive tool to predict endometriosis. This could be especially relevant for adolescents and virgin women to avoid diagnostic laparoscopy and empiric treatment.
Study funding/competing interests: None.
Keywords: Endometriosis; anogenital distance; environmental effects; in utero exposure; surgery.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A short anogenital distance on MRI is a marker of endometriosis.Hum Reprod Open. 2021 Feb 17;2021(1):hoab003. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoab003. eCollection 2021. Hum Reprod Open. 2021. PMID: 33623831 Free PMC article.
-
Endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis in adulthood are strongly associated with anogenital distance, a biomarker for prenatal hormonal environment.Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2377-83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew163. Epub 2016 Jun 28. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 27357299 Free PMC article.
-
Ovarian response is associated with anogenital distance in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF.Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1696-1704. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey244. Hum Reprod. 2018. PMID: 30016431
-
Hypothetical roadmap towards endometriosis: prenatal endocrine-disrupting chemical pollutant exposure, anogenital distance, gut-genital microbiota and subclinical infections.Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Feb 28;26(2):214-246. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz044. Hum Reprod Update. 2020. PMID: 32108227 Review.
-
Anogenital distance as a toxicological or clinical marker for fetal androgen action and risk for reproductive disorders.Arch Toxicol. 2019 Feb;93(2):253-272. doi: 10.1007/s00204-018-2350-5. Epub 2018 Nov 14. Arch Toxicol. 2019. PMID: 30430187 Review.
Cited by
-
Are Adenomyosis and Endometriosis Phenotypes of the Same Disease Process?Biomolecules. 2023 Dec 25;14(1):32. doi: 10.3390/biom14010032. Biomolecules. 2023. PMID: 38254632 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shorter Anogenital Distance in Women with Ovarian Endometriomas and Adenomyosis, but Not Uterine Leiomyomas.Biomedicines. 2023 Sep 23;11(10):2618. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102618. Biomedicines. 2023. PMID: 37892992 Free PMC article.
-
Association between anogenital distance as a noninvasive index in the diagnosis and prognosis of reproductive disorder: A systematic review.Int J Reprod Biomed. 2023 Sep 20;21(8):599-618. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v21i8.14016. eCollection 2023 Aug. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2023. PMID: 37885976 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is There a Correlation between the Second-to-Four Digit Ratio (2D:4D) and Endometriosis? Results of a Case-Control Study.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 4;12(5):2040. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052040. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36902827 Free PMC article.
-
Prenatal Origins of Endometriosis Pathology and Pain: Reviewing the Evidence of a Role for Low Testosterone.J Pain Res. 2023 Feb 3;16:307-316. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S389166. eCollection 2023. J Pain Res. 2023. PMID: 36762368 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bazot M, Daraï E. Diagnosis of deep endometriosis: clinical examination, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other techniques. Fertil Steril 2017;108:886–894. - PubMed
-
- Bazot M, Lafont C, Rouzier R, Roseau G, Thomassin-Naggara I, Daraï E. Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination, transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1825–1833. - PubMed
-
- Cano-Sancho G, Ploteau S, Matta K, Adoamnei E, Louis GB, Mendiola J, Darai E, Squifflet J, Le Bizec B, Antignac J-P. Human epidemiological evidence about the associations between exposure to organochlorine chemicals and endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int 2019;123:209–223. - PubMed
-
- Collinet P, Fritel X, Revel-Delhom C, Ballester M, Bolze PA, Borghese B, Bornsztein N, Boujenah J, Bourdel N, Brillac T et al. . Prise en charge de l’endométriose : recommandations pour la pratique clinique CNGOF-HAS (texte court). Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertil Sénologie 2018;46:144–155. - PubMed
-
- Dean A, Sharpe RM. Anogenital distance or digit length ratio as measures of fetal androgen exposure: relationship to male reproductive development and its disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:2230–2238. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials