Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;24(11):3107-3123.
doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02865-7.

A Dyadic Perspective on Sexual Agreements Among Same-Sex Male Couples in the United States

Erin Rogers  1   2 , Matthew J Mimiaga  3   4   5   6 , Robert Garofalo  7   8 , Emily Brown  6 , Anna Bratcher  9 , Taylor Wimbly  9 , Marco A Hidalgo  7   8 , Sam Hoehnle  7   8 , Jennie Thai  7 , Erin Kahle  2   10 , Patrick S Sullivan  9 , Rob Stephenson  11   12
Affiliations

A Dyadic Perspective on Sexual Agreements Among Same-Sex Male Couples in the United States

Erin Rogers et al. AIDS Behav. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Sexual agreements are an important HIV risk reduction strategy enacted by men in male-male partnerships. Greater levels of relationship quality have been associated with sexual agreement formation and adherence. However, current evidence supporting the associations between relationship quality and sexual agreements for male dyads is based primarily on the responses of just one partner. Understanding that relationship quality and decisions about sexual agreements are inherently influenced by both partners, the present analysis uses dyadic-level data to examine the sexual agreements among 199 HIV serodiscordant and seroconcordant male dyads (n = 398 individuals). Specifically, the analysis examines measures of love, trust, and conflict style as they relate to (1) the type of agreement established, (2) concordance in agreement reporting, (3) satisfaction with the agreement, and (4) broken agreements. A discrepancy in love between partners was associated with the type of agreement established, whether they reported the same agreement type, and whether one of the partners reported a broken agreement, but it was not associated with either partner's satisfaction with the agreement. A discrepancy in trust was associated with agreement concordance and agreement breaks, but it was not associated with the type of agreement established or satisfaction with the agreement. Lastly, a discrepancy in conflict style was associated with each of the agreement outcomes. Future research and intervention efforts should focus on understanding the behavioral and communication skills necessary for couples to make successful sexual agreements.

Keywords: Gay men; Relationship quality; Same-sex couples; Sexual agreement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ. Social context, sexual networks, and racial disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(s1):S115–22. https://doi.org/10.1086/425280 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnes JC, Jorgensen C, Beaver KM, Boutwell BB, Wright JP. Arrest prevalence in a national sample of adults: the role of sex and race/ethnicity. Am J Crim Justice. 2015;40(3):457–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9273-3 . - DOI
    1. Brady S, Busse WJ. The gay identity questionnaire: a brief measure of homosexual identity formation. J Homosex. 1994;26(4):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v26n04_01 . - DOI
    1. Brady SS, Iantaffi A, Galos DL, Rosser BRS. Open, closed, or in between: relationship configuration and condom use among men who use the internet to seek sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(4):1499–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0316-9 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Brody DJ, Pratt LA, Hughes JP. Prevalence of depression among adults aged 20 and over: United States, 2013–2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2018;303:1–8.

LinkOut - more resources