Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 4:10:2709.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02709. eCollection 2019.

Evolutionary Mismatch in Mating

Cari D Goetz  1 , Elizabeth G Pillsworth  2 , David M Buss  3 , Daniel Conroy-Beam  4
Affiliations

Evolutionary Mismatch in Mating

Cari D Goetz et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Evolutionary mismatch concepts are being fruitfully employed in a number of research domains, including medicine, health, and human cognition and behavior to generate novel hypotheses and better understand existing findings. We contend that research on human mating will benefit from explicitly addressing both the evolutionary mismatch of the people we study and the evolutionary mismatch of people conducting the research. We identified nine mismatch characteristics important to the study of human mating and reviewed the literature related to each of these characteristics. Many of the people we study are: exposed to social media, in temporary relationships, relocatable, autonomous in their mating decisions, nulliparous, in groups that are socially segmented, in an educational setting, confronted with lots of options, and young. We applied mismatch concepts to each characteristic to illustrate the importance of incorporating mismatch into this research area. Our aim in this paper is not to identify all potential mismatch effects in mating research, nor to challenge or disqualify existing data. Rather, we demonstrate principled ways of thinking about evolutionary mismatch in order to propel progress in mating research. We show how attending to the potential effects of mismatch can help us refine our theoretical and methodological approaches and deepen our understanding of existing patterns in the empirical record. We conclude with specific recommendations about how to include consideration of evolutionary mismatch into research on human mating.

Keywords: attraction; evolutionary mismatch; evolutionary psychology; mating; relationships.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Apicella C. L. (2014). Upper-body strength predicts hunting reputation and reproductive success in Hadza hunter–gatherers. Evol. Hum. Behav. 35 508–518. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.07.001 - DOI
    1. Apicella C. L., Feinberg D. R., Marlowe F. W. (2007). Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers. Biol. Lett. 3 682–684. 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0410 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Apostolou M. (2007). Sexual selection under parental choice: the role of parents in the evolution of human mating. Evol. Hum. Behav. 28 403–409. 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.007 - DOI
    1. Apostolou M. (2012). Sexual selection under parental choice: evidence from sixteen historical societies. Evol. Psychol. 10 504–518. 10.1177/147470491201000308 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bailey R. C., Aunger R. V. (1995). “Sexuality, infertility, and sexually transmitted disease among farmers and foragers in Central Africa,” in Sexual nature/sexual culture, eds Abramson P. R., Pinkerton S. D., (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; ), 195–222.

LinkOut - more resources