Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Oct;39(7):655-668.
doi: 10.1002/micr.30513. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

Current status of simulation and training models in microsurgery: A systematic review

Pernia Javid  1 , Abdullatif Aydın  1 , Pari-Naz Mohanna  2 , Prokar Dasgupta  1 , Kamran Ahmed  1   3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Current status of simulation and training models in microsurgery: A systematic review

Pernia Javid et al. Microsurgery. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

With the prolific uptake of simulation-based training courses, this systematic review aims to identify the available microsurgical simulation and training models, their status of validation, associated studies, and levels of evidence (LoE) for each training model, thereby establishing a level of recommendation (LoR). MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for English language articles, describing microsurgery simulators and/or validation studies. All studies were assessed for LoE, and each model was subsequently awarded a LoR using a modified Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine classification, adapted for education, with 1 being the highest and 4 the lowest score. A total of 86 studies were identified describing 64 models and simulators ranging from bench models, cadaveric animal tissue, cadaveric human tissue, live animal models, virtual reality simulators, and training curricula. Of these, 49 simulators had at least one validation study. Models were assessed for face (n = 42), content (n = 31), construct (n = 25), transfer (n = 10), and concurrent validity (n = 1) by these studies. The most commonly identified modality was bench models (n = 28) followed by cadaveric animal tissue (n = 24). The cryopreserved rat aorta model received the highest LoR followed by chicken wing, chicken thigh and practice cardboard models. Microsurgery simulation is a growing field and increasing numbers of models are being produced. However, there are still only a few validation studies with a high LoE. It is therefore imperative that training models and/or programs are evaluated for validity and efficacy in order to allow utilization in microsurgical skills acquisition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ad-El, D. D., Harper, A., & Hoffman, L. A. (2000). Digital replantation teaching model in rats. Microsurgery, 20(1), 42-44.
    1. Allouni, A., Amer, T., Ismail, M., & Ismail, T. (2014). The human umbilical cord: A model for microsurgical training. Journal of Hand and Microsurgery, 6(2), 110-112.
    1. Amara, B., Fernandez, J. J., Newlin, L., & Buncke, H. J. (2008). Transfer of the rat tail: An experimental model for free osteocutaneous transfer. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, 14(05), 359-362.
    1. American Society for Reconstructive Mircrosurgery. What Is Reconstructive Microsurgery? - Patient Information; n.d. Retrieved from http://www.microsurg.org/patients/whatis/
    1. Amin, M., Rosen, C. A., Simpson, C. B., & Postma, G. N. (2007). Hands-on training methods for vocal fold injection education. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 116(1), 1-6.

LinkOut - more resources