Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 7:10:1689.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01689. eCollection 2019.

The Role of Anxiety, Coping Strategies, and Emotional Intelligence on General Perceived Self-Efficacy in University Students

Affiliations

The Role of Anxiety, Coping Strategies, and Emotional Intelligence on General Perceived Self-Efficacy in University Students

Francisco Manuel Morales-Rodríguez et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The main objective of the present research is to analyze the relationship of levels of self-efficacy and anxiety, coping strategies, and emotional intelligence in Spanish university students. This study has a cross-sectional design. The sample was composed of 258 university students recruited from three academic areas. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate regression analyses were performed. Significant bivariate analysis showed a significant inverse correlation between self-efficacy and state anxiety (r = -0.340) and trait anxiety (r = -0.466). In addition, a direct correlation was found between self-efficacy and the coping strategies of problem-solving (r = 0.312), emotional expression (r = 0.133), cognitive restructuring (r = 0.195), social withdrawal (r = 0.103), and coping with a situation (r = 0.303), as well as with the emotional intelligence dimensions of emotional clarity (r = 0.397) and repair mood (r = 0.347). Multivariate regression analysis showed that trait anxiety, problem-solving, emotional expression, social withdrawal, and emotional clarity were significantly related to the dependent variable, predicting 39% of total variance on levels of general perceived self-efficacy. In conclusion, this paper contributes to a better understanding of the related factors to general perceived self-efficacy in undergraduate students.

Keywords: academic performance; coping strategies; emotional intelligence; self-efficacy; university students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of subjects who participated in the study according STROBE statement.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adeyemo D. A. (2007). Moderating influence of emotional intelligence on the link between academic self-efficacy and achievement of university students. Psychol. Dev. Soc. 19, 199–213. 10.1177/097133360701900204 - DOI
    1. Baessler J., Schwarzer R. (1996). Evaluación de la autoeficacia; Adaptación española de la escala de autoeficacia general [assessing self-efficacy: Spanish adaption of the general self-efficacy scale]. Ansiedad Estrés 2, 1–8.
    1. Bandura A. (1987). Pensamiento y Acción [thought and action]. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
    1. Belaunzaran J. (2018). EuroPsy: un Modelo basado en competencias. ¿Es aplicable a la formación sanitaria especializada en Psicología Clínica? [descriptive analysis of EuroPsy: a competency-based model. Is this model applicable to specialised health training in clinical psychology?]. Edu. Méd. 394, 1–9. 10.1016/j.edumed.2018.05.017 - DOI
    1. Blanco A. (2010). Creencias de autoeficacia de estudiantes universitarios: un estudio empírico sobre la especificidad del constructo [self-efficacy beliefs in university students: an empirical study on the specificity of the construct]. Relieve 16, 1–28. Retrieved from http://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v16n1/RELIEVEv16n1_2.htm