Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 14;14(8):e0220150.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220150. eCollection 2019.

Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations

Affiliations

Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations

Patricia Hirsch et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

According to a popular stereotype, women are better at multitasking than men, but empirical evidence for gender differences in multitasking performance is mixed. Previous work has focused on specific aspects of multitasking or has not considered gender differences in abilities contributing to multitasking performance. We therefore tested gender differences (N = 96, 50% female) in sequential (i.e., task switching) and concurrent (i.e., dual tasking) multitasking, while controlling for possible gender differences in working memory, processing speed, spatial abilities, and fluid intelligence. Applying two standard experimental paradigms allowed us to test multitasking abilities across five different empirical indices (i.e., performance costs) for both reaction time (RT) and accuracy measures, respectively. Multitasking resulted in substantial performance costs across all experimental conditions without a single significant gender difference in any of these ten measures, even when controlling for gender differences in underlying cognitive abilities. Thus, our results do not confirm the widespread stereotype that women are better at multitasking than men at least in the popular sequential and concurrent multitasking settings used in the present study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. RT (ms) for task-switching as a function of trial type (switch, repetition, single-task), response-stimulus-interval (RSI, 100 ms vs. 600 ms), and gender (women vs. men) and for the dual-task for Task 1 and Task 2 as a function of task transition (Task 1-Task 2 switch trials, Task 1-Task2 repetition trials, single-task trials), stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA; 100 ms vs. 600 ms) and gender (women vs. men). Error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Performance costs in the reaction times (in ms, A) and in error rates (in %, B) for task-switching and dual tasking as a function of gender (women vs. men). Error bars represent the standard error.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Szameitat AJ, Hamaida Y, Tulley RS, Saylik R, Otermans PJC. “Women are better than men”–Public beliefs on gender differences and other aspects of multitasking. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0140371; 10.1371/journal.pone.0140371 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silverman I, Eals M. Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data In: Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tobby J, editors. The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. pp. 487–503.
    1. Strobach T, Woszidlo A. Young and Older Adults' Gender Stereotype in Multitasking. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015; 6, 10.3389/FPSYG.2015.01922 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Künzell S, Broeker L, Dignath D. Ewolds H, Raab M, Thomaschke R. What is a task? An ideomotor perspective. Psychological Research. 2018;82: 4–11. 10.1007/s00426-017-0942-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koch I, Poljac E, Müller H, Kiesel A. Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking–An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin. 2018;144: 557–583. 10.1037/bul0000144 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

This research was funded by DFG grant KO 2045/19-1 (www.dfg.de) in the context of the DFG Priority Program 1772 (Human performance under multiple cognitive task requirements: From basic mechanisms to optimized task scheduling; awarded to Iring Koch). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. There was no additional external funding received for this study.