Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations
- PMID: 31412048
- PMCID: PMC6693743
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220150
Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations
Abstract
According to a popular stereotype, women are better at multitasking than men, but empirical evidence for gender differences in multitasking performance is mixed. Previous work has focused on specific aspects of multitasking or has not considered gender differences in abilities contributing to multitasking performance. We therefore tested gender differences (N = 96, 50% female) in sequential (i.e., task switching) and concurrent (i.e., dual tasking) multitasking, while controlling for possible gender differences in working memory, processing speed, spatial abilities, and fluid intelligence. Applying two standard experimental paradigms allowed us to test multitasking abilities across five different empirical indices (i.e., performance costs) for both reaction time (RT) and accuracy measures, respectively. Multitasking resulted in substantial performance costs across all experimental conditions without a single significant gender difference in any of these ten measures, even when controlling for gender differences in underlying cognitive abilities. Thus, our results do not confirm the widespread stereotype that women are better at multitasking than men at least in the popular sequential and concurrent multitasking settings used in the present study.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
![Fig 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6693743/bin/pone.0220150.g001.gif)
![Fig 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6693743/bin/pone.0220150.g002.gif)
Similar articles
-
Gender differences in multitasking experience and performance.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Feb;74(2):344-362. doi: 10.1177/1747021820960707. Epub 2020 Sep 28. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021. PMID: 32933422
-
Multiple processing limitations underlie multitasking costs.Psychol Res. 2020 Oct;84(7):1946-1964. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01196-0. Epub 2019 May 9. Psychol Res. 2020. PMID: 31073770
-
Multitasking across the lifespan in different task contexts.Sci Rep. 2024 May 23;14(1):11817. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61859-w. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38783047 Free PMC article.
-
Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking-An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research.Psychol Bull. 2018 Jun;144(6):557-583. doi: 10.1037/bul0000144. Epub 2018 Mar 8. Psychol Bull. 2018. PMID: 29517261 Review.
-
Common and distinct neural correlates of dual-tasking and task-switching: a meta-analytic review and a neuro-cognitive processing model of human multitasking.Brain Struct Funct. 2019 Jun;224(5):1845-1869. doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01870-4. Epub 2019 Apr 29. Brain Struct Funct. 2019. PMID: 31037397 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Mutual interference between memory encoding and motor skills: the influence of motor expertise.Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 15;14:1196978. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196978. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 38162966 Free PMC article.
-
Task Switching: On the Relation of Cognitive Flexibility with Cognitive Capacity.J Intell. 2023 Mar 30;11(4):68. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040068. J Intell. 2023. PMID: 37103253 Free PMC article.
-
Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of a Multitasking Instrument in the Context of Collectivist Asian Culture.Psychol Russ. 2022 Mar 30;15(1):135-153. doi: 10.11621/pir.2022.0109. eCollection 2022. Psychol Russ. 2022. PMID: 36699819 Free PMC article.
-
Parenthood and science careers: the impact is not the same for everyone.Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2022;31(2):e2022354. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222022000200013. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2022. PMID: 35830007 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Functional Connectivity and Networks Underlying Complex Tool-Use Movement in Assembly Workers: An fMRI Study.Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Oct 28;15:707502. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.707502. eCollection 2021. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34776900 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Silverman I, Eals M. Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data In: Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tobby J, editors. The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. pp. 487–503.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources