Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0220576.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220576. eCollection 2019.

Anthropogenic noise affects male house wren response to but not detection of territorial intruders

Affiliations

Anthropogenic noise affects male house wren response to but not detection of territorial intruders

Erin E Grabarczyk et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise decreases signal active space, or the area over which male bird song can be detected in the environment. For territorial males, noise may make it more difficult to detect and assess territorial challenges, which in turn may increase defense costs and influence whether males maintain territory ownership. We tested the hypothesis that noise affects the ability of male house wrens (Troglodytes aedon) near active nests to detect intruders and alters responses to them. We broadcast pre-recorded male song and pink noise on territories to simulate intrusions with and without noise, as well as to noise alone. We measured detection by how long males took to sing or approach the speaker after the start of a playback. To measure whether playbacks changed male behavior, we compared their vocal responses before and during treatments, as well as compared mean vocal responses and the number of flyovers and attacks on the speaker during treatments. Noise did not affect a male's ability to detect an intruder on his territory. Males altered their responses to simulated intruders with and without noise compared to the noise-only treatment by singing longer songs at faster rates. Males increased peak frequency of songs during intrusions without noise compared to noise-only treatments, but frequency during intruder plus noise treatments did not differ from either. When confronting simulated intruders in noise, males increased the number of attacks on the speaker compared to intruders without noise, possibly because they were less able to assess intruders via songs and relied on close encounters for information. Although noise did not affect intruder detection, noise affected some aspects of singing and aggressive responses, which may be related to the challenge of discriminating and assessing territorial threats under elevated noise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Male house wrens did not differ in the delay from beginning of playbacks to their first songs based on treatment (n = 12 intruder alone, n = 15 intruder plus noise, n = 18 noise alone).
Fig 2
Fig 2
In response to an intruder, (A) male house wrens increase song peak frequency (Hz) during an intrusion with (n = 13) and without noise (n = 12), and but decreased peak frequency in response to noise alone (n = 8) compared to pre-playback control periods. (B) On average males sing at a higher peak frequency during an intrusion without noise (n = 13) compared to the noise only treatment (n = 14). Male responses to an intruder with noise (n = 13) did not differ from either the noise only or intruder only treatment. Breeding stage was not a significant predictor of song peak frequency.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Male house wrens increased singing rate (A) in response to an intruder with (n = 12) and without noise (n = 15), but they did not change singing rate in noise (n = 18) compared to pre-playback control periods. (B) On average males sang at a higher rate when an intruder was present, regardless of whether or not noise was played, than during noise playback alone.
Fig 4
Fig 4
(A) Treatment did not influence change in song duration. (B) During later breeding stages, males increased their song duration in response to treatments (n = 13 intruder alone, n = 12 intruder with noise, n = 14 noise alone), whereas males during early stages overall did not increase their song duration.
Fig 5
Fig 5
(A) Mean song duration was longer in response to an intruder with (n = 13) and without noise (n = 13) compared to noise alone (n = 14). (B) During early breeding stages (n = 16) males sang longer songs compared to later stages (n = 24).
Fig 6
Fig 6
Males attacked the playback speaker more during an intrusion with noise (n = 14) compared to an intruder alone (n = 12; (A)), treatment did not affect the number of fly overs towards the speaker (B).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Endler JA. Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution. Am Nat. 1992;139:S125–S53.
    1. Wiley RH. Signal Detection, Noise, and the Evolution of Communication. Brumm H. ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2013.
    1. Klump GM. Bird communication in the noisy world. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1996.
    1. Lenske AK, La VT. White-throated sparrows alter songs differentially in response to chorusing anurans and other background noise. Behav Process. 2014;105:28–35. - PubMed
    1. Lengagne T, Aubin T, Lauga J, Jouventin P. How do king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) apply the mathematical theory of information to communicate in windy conditions? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol. 1999;266(1429):1623–8.

Publication types

Grants and funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (Grant no. 1257699) to SAG and K. Naghshineh. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.