Menstrual cup use, leakage, acceptability, safety, and availability: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 31324419
- PMCID: PMC6669309
- DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30111-2
Menstrual cup use, leakage, acceptability, safety, and availability: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Girls and women need effective, safe, and affordable menstrual products. Single-use products are regularly selected by agencies for resource-poor settings; the menstrual cup is a less known alternative. We reviewed international studies on menstrual cup leakage, acceptability, and safety and explored menstrual cup availability to inform programmes.
Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Popline, Cinahl, Global Health database, Emerald, Google Scholar, Science.gov, and WorldWideScience from database inception to May 14, 2019, for quantitative or qualitative studies published in English on experiences and leakage associated with menstrual cups, and adverse event reports. We also screened the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database from the US Food and Drug Administration for events related to menstrual cups. To be eligible for inclusion, the material needed to have information on leakage, acceptability, or safety of menstrual cups. The main outcome of interest was menstrual blood leakage when using a menstrual cup. Safety outcomes of interest included serious adverse events; vaginal abrasions and effects on vaginal microflora; effects on the reproductive, digestive, or urinary tract; and safety in poor sanitary conditions. Findings were tabulated or combined by use of forest plots (random-effects meta-analysis). We also did preliminary estimates on costs and environmental savings potentially associated with cups. This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO, number CRD42016047845.
Findings: Of 436 records identified, 43 studies were eligible for analysis (3319 participants). Most studies reported on vaginal cups (27 [63%] vaginal cups, five [12%] cervical cups, and 11 [25%] mixed types of cups or unknown) and 15 were from low-income and middle-income countries. 22 studies were included in qualitative or quantitative syntheses, of which only three were of moderate-to-high quality. Four studies made a direct comparison between menstrual cups and usual products for the main outcome of leakage and reported leakage was similar or lower for menstrual cups than for disposable pads or tampons (n=293). In all qualitative studies, the adoption of the menstrual cup required a familiarisation phase over several menstrual cycles and peer support improved uptake (two studies in developing countries). In 13 studies, 73% (pooled estimate: n=1144; 95% CI 59-84, I2=96%) of participants wished to continue use of the menstrual cup at study completion. Use of the menstrual cup showed no adverse effects on the vaginal flora (four studies, 507 women). We identified five women who reported severe pain or vaginal wounds, six reports of allergies or rashes, nine of urinary tract complaints (three with hydronephrosis), and five of toxic shock syndrome after use of the menstrual cup. Dislodgement of an intrauterine device was reported in 13 women who used the menstrual cup (eight in case reports, and five in one study) between 1 week and 13 months of insertion of the intrauterine device. Professional assistance to aid removal of menstrual cup was reported among 47 cervical cup users and two vaginal cup users. We identified 199 brands of menstrual cup, and availability in 99 countries with prices ranging US$0·72-46·72 (median $23·3, 145 brands).
Interpretation: Our review indicates that menstrual cups are a safe option for menstruation management and are being used internationally. Good quality studies in this field are needed. Further studies are needed on cost-effectiveness and environmental effect comparing different menstrual products.
Funding: UK Medical Research Council, Department for International Development, and Wellcome Trust.
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6669309/bin/gr1.gif)
![Figure 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6669309/bin/gr2.gif)
![Figure 3](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6669309/bin/gr3.gif)
Comment in
-
Inserting informed choice into global menstrual product use and provision.Lancet Public Health. 2019 Aug;4(8):e361-e362. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30126-4. Epub 2019 Jul 16. Lancet Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31324420 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability and feasibility of using vaginal menstrual cups among schoolgirls in rural Nepal: a qualitative pilot study.Reprod Health. 2021 Jan 25;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01036-0. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 33487171 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring menstrual products: A systematic review and meta-analysis of reusable menstrual pads for public health internationally.PLoS One. 2021 Sep 24;16(9):e0257610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257610. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34559839 Free PMC article.
-
Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 30;(4):CD002126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002126.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 12;6:CD002126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002126.pub4. PMID: 25924648 Updated. Review.
-
Behavioral and Pharmacotherapy Weight Loss Interventions to Prevent Obesity-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Sep. Report No.: 18-05239-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Sep. Report No.: 18-05239-EF-1. PMID: 30354042 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
A pharmacist's role in increasing access to menstrual products: an education and advocacy approach.Front Reprod Health. 2024 May 17;6:1364698. doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1364698. eCollection 2024. Front Reprod Health. 2024. PMID: 38827820 Free PMC article.
-
A pilot survey of students' menstrual attitudes, experiences, and needs on an urban university campus.Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241254713. doi: 10.1177/17455057241254713. Womens Health (Lond). 2024. PMID: 38819035 Free PMC article.
-
High uptake of menstrual health information, products and analgesics within an integrated sexual reproductive health service for young people in Zimbabwe.Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 22;21(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01789-y. Reprod Health. 2024. PMID: 38649934 Free PMC article.
-
Water, sanitation and hygiene at sex work venues to support menstrual needs.Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 28;12:1305601. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1305601. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38481834 Free PMC article.
-
Menstrual health inequities and "period poverty" in Canada.Can J Public Health. 2024 Jun;115(3):502-506. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00853-1. Epub 2024 Feb 21. Can J Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38381303
References
-
- United Nations Population division. World population prospects. 2019. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/
-
- Sebert Kuhlmann A, Peters Bergquist E, Danjoint D, Wall LL. Unmet menstrual hygiene needs among low-income women. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:238–244. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources