The impact of occupational shift work and working hours during pregnancy on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 31276631
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.051
The impact of occupational shift work and working hours during pregnancy on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Backgroud: An increasing number of original studies suggest that exposure to shift work and long working hours during pregnancy could be associated with the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, but the results remain conflicting and inconclusive.
Objective: To examine the influences of shift work and longer working hours during pregnancy on maternal and fetal health outcomes.
Data sources: Five electronic databases and 3 gray literature sources were searched up to March 15, 2019.
Methods of study selection: Studies of all designs (except case studies and reviews) were included, which contained information on the relevant population (women who engaged in paid work during pregnancy); exposure (rotating shift work [shifts change according to a set schedule], fixed night shift [typical working period is between 11:00 pm and 11:00 am] or longer working hours [>40 hours per week]);comparator (fixed day shift [typical working period is between 8:00 am and 6:00 pm] or standard working hours [≤40 hours per week]); and outcomes (preterm delivery, low birthweight [birthweight <2500 g], small for gestational age, miscarriage, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, stillbirth, and gestational diabetes mellitus).
Tabulation, integration, and results: From 3305 unique citations, 62 observational studies (196,989 women) were included. "Low" to "very low" certainty evidence from these studies revealed that working rotating shifts was associated with an increased odds of preterm delivery (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.28, I2 = 31%), an infant small for gestational age (odds ratio, 1.18, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.38, I2 = 0%), preeclampsia (odds ratio, 1.75, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.01, I2 = 75%), and gestational hypertension (odds ratio, 1.19, 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.29, I2 = 0%), compared to those who worked a fixed day shift. Working fixed night shifts was associated with an increased odds of preterm delivery (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.42; I2 = 36%) and miscarriage (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.47; I2 = 37%). Compared with standard hours, working longer hours was associated with an increased odds of miscarriage (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.77; I2 = 73%), preterm delivery (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.33; I2 = 30%), an infant of low birthweight (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.84; I2 = 0%), or an infant small for gestational age (odds ratio, 1.16, 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.36, I2 = 57%). Dose-response analysis showed that women working more than 55.5 hours (vs 40 hours) per week had a 10% increase in the odds of having a preterm delivery.
Conclusion: Pregnant women who work rotating shifts, fixed night shifts, or longer hours have an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Keywords: pregnancy outcomes; shift work; working hours.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Gestational weight gain below instead of within the guidelines per class of maternal obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Sep;4(5):100682. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100682. Epub 2022 Jun 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022. PMID: 35728780 Review.
-
Effects of long working hours and shift work during pregnancy on obstetric and perinatal outcomes: A large prospective cohort study-Japan Environment and Children's Study.Birth. 2020 Mar;47(1):67-79. doi: 10.1111/birt.12463. Epub 2019 Oct 31. Birth. 2020. PMID: 31667913 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of occupational activities during pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;222(3):224-238. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.059. Epub 2019 Sep 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31550447
-
Maternal and neonatal outcomes after bariatric surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis: do the benefits outweigh the risks?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29454871
-
Celiac disease and obstetric complications: a systematic review and metaanalysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;214(2):225-234. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.080. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26432464 Review.
Cited by
-
Prediction of pregnancy disorders in female workers in the industrial sector.Heliyon. 2024 May 13;10(10):e30987. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30987. eCollection 2024 May 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38803879 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple Job Holding, Job Changes, and Associations with Gestational Diabetes and Pregnancy-Related Hypertension in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 14;21(5):619. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050619. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38791833 Free PMC article.
-
Residents' Perspectives of Pregnancy and Growing a Family During Surgical Training: A Review of the Literature.Cureus. 2024 Apr 15;16(4):e58335. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58335. eCollection 2024 Apr. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38752085 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transforming Perceptions: The Impact of a Formal Parental Leave Policy on Surgical Trainees.J Surg Educ. 2024 Jun;81(6):816-822. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Apr 27. J Surg Educ. 2024. PMID: 38677898
-
The maternal factors associated with infant low birth weight: an umbrella review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06487-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 38664680 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials