Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis
- PMID: 31228780
- DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104923
Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis
Abstract
Background: As populations become increasingly urbanised, the preservation of urban green space (UGS) becomes paramount. UGS is not just dedicated recreational space such as public parks, but other types of informal green space are important, for example, street trees and roof gardens. Despite the potential from cross-sectional evidence, we know little about how to design new, or improve or promote existing UGS for health, wellbeing, social and environmental benefits, or known influencing factors such as physical activity.
Objectives: To perform a meta-narrative review of the evidence regarding the health, wellbeing, social, environmental and equity effects, or known influencing factors of these outcomes, of UGS interventions.
Data sources: Eight electronic databases were searched ((Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science (Science and Social Science Citation Indices), PADDI (Planning Architecture Design Database Ireland), Zetoc, Scopus, Greenfiles, SIGLE (System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe)), and reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews were hand searched for further relevant studies.
Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions: Eligibility criteria included: (i) evaluation of an UGS intervention; and (ii) health, wellbeing, social or environmental outcome(s), or known influencing factors of these outcomes, measured. Interventions involving any age group were included. Interventions must have involved: (a) physical change to green space in an urban-context including improvements to existing UGS or development of new UGS, or (b) combination of physical change to UGS supplemented by a specific UGS awareness, marketing or promotion programme to encourage use of UGS.
Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Following a meta-narrative approach, evidence was synthesised by main intervention approach, including: (i) park-based; (ii) greenways/trails; (iii) urban greening; (iv) large green built projects for environmental purposes. Outcomes such as economic (e.g. cost effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses), adverse effects and unintended consequences were also extracted. Evidence was synthesised following the RAMESES guidelines and publication standards, the PROGRESS-plus tool was used to explore equity impact, and risk of bias/study quality was assessed. The findings from the evidence review were presented at an expert panel representing various disciplines in a workshop and these discussions framed the findings of the review and provide recommendations that are relevant to policy, practice and research.
Results: Of the 6997 studies identified, 38 were included. There was strong evidence to support park-based (7/7 studies) and greenway/trail (3/3 studies) interventions employing a dual-approach (i.e. a physical change to the UGS and promotion/marketing programmes) particularly for park use and physical activity; strong evidence for the greening of vacant lots (4/4 studies) for health, wellbeing (e.g. reduction in stress) and social (e.g. reduction in crime, increased perceptions of safety) outcomes; strong evidence for the provision of urban street trees (3/4 studies) and green built interventions for storm water management (6/7 studies) for environmental outcomes (e.g. increased biodiversity, reduction in illegal dumping). Park-based or greenway/trail interventions that did not employ a dual-approach were largely ineffective (7/12 studies showed no significant intervention effect). Overall, the included studies have inherent biases owing to the largely non-randomized study designs employed. There was too little evidence to draw firm conclusions regarding the impact of UGS interventions on a range of equity indicators. LIMITATIONS; CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: UGS has an important role to play in creating a culture of health and wellbeing. Results from this study provide supportive evidence regarding the use of certain UGS interventions for health, social and environmental benefits. These findings should be interpreted in light of the heterogeneous nature of the evidence base, including diverging methods, target populations, settings and outcomes. We could draw little conclusions regarding the equity impact of UGS interventions. However, the true potential of UGS has not been realised as studies have typically under-evaluated UGS interventions by not taking account of the multifunctional nature of UGS. The findings have implications for policymakers, practitioners and researchers. For example, for policymakers the trajectory of evidence is generally towards a positive association between UGS and health, wellbeing, social and environmental outcomes, but any intervention must ensure that negative consequences of gentrification and unequal access are minimised.
Keywords: Environment; Equity; Health; Meta-narrative review; Social; Systematic review; Urban green space; Wellbeing.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Impact of social protection on gender equality in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of reviews.Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 May 25;18(2):e1240. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1240. eCollection 2022 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36913187 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Investigating the physical activity, health, wellbeing, social and environmental effects of a new urban greenway: a natural experiment (the PARC study).Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 30;18(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01213-9. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021. PMID: 34717650 Free PMC article.
-
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27820426
-
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27819974
-
Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD010067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010067.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23440845 Review.
Cited by
-
The Interplay between Dyslipidemia and Neighboring Developments in Coronary Artery Disease Progression: A Personalized Approach.J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 23;14(3):237. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030237. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 38540979 Free PMC article.
-
Move to Flow: The Benefits and Barriers of a Physical Activity Nature-Based Pilot Programme.Sports (Basel). 2024 Mar 6;12(3):75. doi: 10.3390/sports12030075. Sports (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38535738 Free PMC article.
-
Urban park green space use analysis based on trajectory big data: Experience from a medium-sized city in China.Heliyon. 2024 Feb 19;10(4):e26445. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26445. eCollection 2024 Feb 29. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38420409 Free PMC article.
-
Associations between vacant urban lands and public health outcomes in growing and shrinking cities.Urban For Urban Green. 2023 Nov;89:128127. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128127. Epub 2023 Oct 26. Urban For Urban Green. 2023. PMID: 38274945 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring "Equigenesis" in the Associations Between Green Space and Kidney Health Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults Using Street View Data.Innov Aging. 2023 Nov 23;8(1):igad130. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad130. eCollection 2024. Innov Aging. 2023. PMID: 38235486 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials