Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 1;110(4):805-813.
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz108.

Metabolic adaptation is not observed after 8 weeks of overfeeding but energy expenditure variability is associated with weight recovery

Darcy L Johannsen  1 , Kara L Marlatt  1 , Kevin E Conley  2 , Steven R Smith  3 , Eric Ravussin  1
Affiliations

Metabolic adaptation is not observed after 8 weeks of overfeeding but energy expenditure variability is associated with weight recovery

Darcy L Johannsen et al. Am J Clin Nutr. .

Abstract

Background: A metabolic adaptation, defined as an increase in energy expenditure (EE) beyond what is expected with weight gain during overfeeding (OF), has been reported but also refuted. Much of the inconsistency stems from the difficulty in conducting large, well-controlled OF studies in humans.

Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to determine whether a metabolic adaptation to OF exists and if so, attenuates weight gain.

Methods: Thirty-five young adults consumed 40% above their baseline energy requirements for 8 wk, and sleeping metabolic rate (SMR) and 24-h sedentary energy expenditure (24h-EE) were measured before and after OF. Subjects were asked to return for a 6-mo post-OF follow-up visit to measure body weight, body composition, and physical activity.

Results: After adjusting for gains in fat-free mass and fat mass, SMR increased by 43 ± 123 kcal/d more than expected (P = 0.05) and 24h-EE by 23 ± 139 kcal/d (P = 0.34), indicating an overall lack of metabolic adaptation during OF despite a wide variability in the response. Among the 30 subjects who returned for the 6-mo follow-up visit, those who had a lower-than-predicted SMR (basal EE) retained more of the fat gained during OF. Likewise, subjects displaying a higher-than-predicted sedentary 24h-EE lost significantly more fat during the 6-mo follow-up.

Conclusions: Metabolic adaptation to OF was on average very small but variable between subjects, revealing "thrifty" or "spendthrift" metabolic phenotypes related to body weight loss 6 mo later. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01672632.

Keywords: dietary-induced thermogenesis; energy expenditure; luxuskonsumption; metabolic adaptation; overfeeding; respiratory chamber; sleeping metabolic rate; spendthrift phenotype; thrifty phenotype; weight gain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
“Residuals” in energy expenditure (EE) at baseline and after overfeeding (OF). “Residuals” are calculated as actual EE measurements minus predicted EE measurements, calculated using a previously published dataset (39). (A) Predicted sleeping metabolic rate (SMR, kcal/d) was calculated at baseline and post-OF in 34 adults (28 M, 6 F) as follows: Predicted SMR = 461 + (3.5 × FM) + (19.6 × FFM) − (70*race, where 1=African-American, 0=Caucasian), using measured values of fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) at baseline and post-OF. After OF, mean SMR was significantly higher than predicted by 43 ± 123 kcal/d (*P = 0.05) by paired t test. (B) Predicted 24-h sedentary EE (24h-EE, kcal/d) was calculated at baseline and post-OF in all 35 adults (29 M, 6 F) as follows: Predicted 24h-EE = 546 + (5.2 × FM) + (26.2 × FFM) − (2.3 × age) − (96*race, where 1=African-American, 0=Caucasian), using measured values of FM and FFM at baseline and post-OF. Predicted 24h-EE after OF was not significantly different than measured 24h-EE (23 ± 139, P = 0.34) by paired t test, indicating the 24h-EE increased as expected for the increase in body mass.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
In situ mitochondrial energetics of the vastus lateralis at rest before and after overfeeding. (A) ATP use measured by 31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy did not change after overfeeding (OF) in 23 adults (19 M, 4 F) (6.2 ± 1.2 vs. 6.1 ± 1.3 µM ATP/s; P = 0.79). (B) There was a trend for oxygen use to decrease after OF in 21 adults (18 M, 3 F) (2.3 ± 0.6 vs. 2.0 ± 0.5 µM O2/s; †P = 0.09) by paired t test. (C) Mitochondrial coupling efficiency (P/O ratio) did not change significantly after OF in 20 adults (18 M, 2 F) (1.35 ± 0.34 vs. 1.54 ± 0.50; P = 0.12) by paired t test.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Relation between deviations from predicted EE during overfeeding (OF) and body fat changes 6 mo later. (A) A lower-than-predicted sleeping metabolic rate (SMR) at baseline, suggestive of a more “thrifty” metabolic phenotype, was associated with greater retention of the fat mass gained during OF, after 6 mo of follow-up in 30 adults (25 M, 5 F) using Pearson correlation coefficients. (B) A greater-than-predicted sedentary 24-h energy expenditure (24h-EE) after OF, suggestive of a more “spendthrift” phenotype, was associated with significantly greater fat loss after 6 mo of follow-up in 30 adults (25 M, 5 F) using Pearson correlation coefficients. Shaded symbols represent the males and open symbols represent the females. FM, fat mass.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Leibel RL, Rosenbaum M, Hirsch J. Changes in energy expenditure resulting from altered body weight. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:621–8. - PubMed
    1. Johannsen DL, Knuth ND, Huizenga R, Rood JC, Ravussin E, Hall KD. Metabolic slowing with massive weight loss despite preservation of fat-free mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:2489–96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin CK, Heilbronn LK, De Jonge L, DeLany JP, Volaufova J, Anton SD, Redman LM, Smith SR, Ravussin E. Effect of calorie restriction on resting metabolic rate and spontaneous physical activity. Obesity. 2007;15:2964–73. - PubMed
    1. Sumithran P, Proietto J. The defence of body weight: a physiological basis for weight regain after weight loss. Clin Sci. 2013;124:231–41. - PubMed
    1. Tremblay A, Chaput JP. Short communication: Adaptive reduction in thermogenesis and resistance to lose fat in obese men. Br J Nutr. 2009;102:488–92. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data