Rapid drinking water safety estimation in cities: Piloting a globally scalable method in Cochabamba, Bolivia
- PMID: 30841388
- DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.119
Rapid drinking water safety estimation in cities: Piloting a globally scalable method in Cochabamba, Bolivia
Abstract
Background: Systematically collected and comparable data on drinking water safety at city-scale is currently unavailable, despite the stated importance of water safety monitoring at scale under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We developed a rapid drinking water quality assessment methodology intended to be replicable across all cities and useful for monitoring towards achieving SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation).
Methods: We collected drinking water samples at the point-of-consumption for basic microbial, physical and chemical water quality analysis and conducted household surveys on drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene access from 80 households in the city of Cochabamba over 1 week. We categorized the household's water service level according to the SDG 6 framework.
Results: We estimated an average time requirement of 6.4 person-hours and a consumable cost of US $51 per household (n = 80). In this cross-sectional study, 71% of drinking water samples met World Health Organization (WHO) microbiological safety criteria, 96% met WHO chemical quality criteria, and all met WHO aesthetic quality criteria. However, only 18% of the households were categorized as having safely managed drinking water services. None met the criteria for having safely managed sanitation services; nonetheless, 81% had basic sanitation services and 78% had basic hygiene facilities.
Conclusions: This method can generate basic water safety data for a city at a relatively low cost in terms of person-time and materials, yielding useful information for inter-city analyses. Because 29% of samples did not meet microbiological safety criteria, 22% of the households did not have access to handwashing facilities and none had safe sanitation services, we concluded that Cochabamba did not meet normative SDG 6 targets when surveyed. Our study further suggests that water quality at point-of-use more accurately characterizes drinking water safety than infrastructure type.
Keywords: Peri-urban; Rapid assessment; SDG 6; Urban; Water quality.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
Piloting water quality testing coupled with a national socioeconomic survey in Yogyakarta province, Indonesia, towards tracking of Sustainable Development Goal 6.Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017 Oct;220(7):1141-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 15. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017. PMID: 28743592
-
Water, sanitation and hygiene infrastructure and quality in rural healthcare facilities in Rwanda.BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 3;17(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2460-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017. PMID: 28768518 Free PMC article.
-
A long way to go - Estimates of combined water, sanitation and hygiene coverage for 25 sub-Saharan African countries.PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0171783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171783. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28182796 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of drinking water, sanitation and handwashing with soap on childhood diarrhoeal disease: updated meta-analysis and meta-regression.Trop Med Int Health. 2018 May;23(5):508-525. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13051. Epub 2018 Apr 23. Trop Med Int Health. 2018. PMID: 29537671 Review.
-
Pro-poor governance in water and sanitation service delivery: evidence from Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking Water surveys.Perspect Public Health. 2018 Sep;138(5):261-269. doi: 10.1177/1757913918788109. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Perspect Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30015570 Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous