Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;80(5):298-303.
doi: 10.1111/cod.13210. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101

Affiliations

Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101

Jannet Knijp et al. Contact Dermatitis. 2019 May.

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of lanolin contact allergy in dermatitis patients varies from 1.2% to 6.9%. Different lanolin derivatives are used in patch testing.

Objectives: To determine which combination of lanolin derivatives is most effective in patch testing for the diagnosis of lanolin contact allergy.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients patch tested between 2016 and 2017 was performed. Patients were eligible if they had been tested with lanolin alcohol 30% pet., Amerchol L101 50% pet., and a supplementary series containing other lanolin derivatives. Lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 were tested in duplicate.

Results: Of 594 patients, 28.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.1%-32.3%) had a positive patch test reaction to at least one lanolin derivative. Reactions to lanolin alcohol (14.7%, 95%CI: 11.3%-18.2%) and Amerchol L101 (15.0%, 95%CI: 11.5%-18.5%) were common in the routinely tested series. Reactions to other test preparations were significantly less frequent (P < 0.05). The addition of Amerchol L101 to lanolin alcohol significantly increased the number of positive cases (odds ratio 1.79, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The combination of lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 is effective in patch testing for the diagnosis of lanolin contact allergy. Routinely testing with other lanolin derivatives may not be worthwhile, as it detects only a few additional patients.

Keywords: Amerchol L-101; cetyl alcohol; contact allergy; lanolin alcohol; patch testing; vehicle; wool alcohols.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Venn diagram of lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 tested in duplicate. Shown are the numbers of positive reactions to the test substance in the wool alcohol series and the routinely tested series: the European baseline series (EBS) and routine supplementary series. The reproducibility was 27.3% and 31.2%, respectively

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin L‐P. Contact Dermatitis. 5th ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer‐Verlag; 2011.
    1. Lee B, Warshaw E. Lanolin allergy: history, epidemiology, responsible allergens, and management. Dermatitis. 2008;19:63‐72. - PubMed
    1. Schlossman ML, Mccarthy JP. Lanolin and derivatives chemistry: relationship to allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1979;5:65‐72. - PubMed
    1. Warshaw EM, Nelsen DD, Maibach HI, et al. Positive patch test reactions to lanolin: cross‐sectional data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994 to 2006. Dermatitis. 2009;20:79‐88. - PubMed
    1. Thyssen JP, Mcfadden JP, Kimber I. The multiple factors affecting the association between atopic dermatitis and contact sensitization. Allergy. 2014;69:28‐36. - PubMed