Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of Brazil
- PMID: 30463569
- PMCID: PMC6249882
- DOI: 10.1186/s13002-018-0273-0
Ethnotaxonomy of sharks from tropical waters of Brazil
Abstract
Background: Accessing folk knowledge from small-scale fishers is an affordable and reliable approach to understand the dynamic and diversity of shark species worldwide, especially of those eventually caught. In this context, ethnotaxonomy (folk identification and classification) may represent an alternative to support sharks fisheries management, especially in data-poor places. This study aimed to investigate fishing and ethnotaxonomy of the main shark species caught by small-scale fisheries from the coastal waters of the Brazilian Northeast.
Methods: Semi-structured and structured interviews were conducted with fishers targeting general aspects of fishing activities and specific topics regarding ethnotaxonomy, capture, and commercialization of sharks. For species identification, an ethnobiological systematic perspective was used to analyze the folk nomenclature and classification criteria. Non-parametric statistical tests were used to verify associations between species caught, fishing gear, and harvest period.
Results: Fishers mentioned 73 binomial names, 21 main folk species, and eight synonymies. Some species belonging to the same scientific genus are often named and grouped by the same folk name, with no distinction between species by fishers. Sharks are most landed as bycatch and correspond to less than 5% of the total commercial fisheries in the communities, with socioeconomic value for subsistence consumption and local commercialization. Sharks were said to be mainly caught with hand line and surface long line during the rainy season, while gillnet captures were associated to the dry season. At least three of the species most mentioned by fishers are currently classified as vulnerable and endangered worldwide.
Conclusions: Even though landed sharks account for a small proportion of the fishing catches, their biological and life history features place sharks among the most vulnerable organisms globally. Such an ethnobiological approach towards shark identification may contribute to generate basic information on species caught, their frequency in the landings, and how different species belonging to the same genus can be landed and sold together. This type of information can generate subsidies to the development of conservation and management plans for these fishing resources, where knowledge is scarce.
Keywords: Bycatch fauna; Coastal fishing resources; Fishers’ local knowledge.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, protocol of approval no 80014117.4.0000.5537.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
![Fig. 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6249882/bin/13002_2018_273_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6249882/bin/13002_2018_273_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 3](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6249882/bin/13002_2018_273_Fig3_HTML.gif)
Similar articles
-
Whales, dolphins or fishes? The ethnotaxonomy of cetaceans in São Sebastião, Brazil.J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007 Feb 20;3:9. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-3-9. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007. PMID: 17311681 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of the supply chain and conservation status of sharks (Elasmobranchii: Superorder Selachimorpha) based on fisher knowledge.PLoS One. 2018 Mar 13;13(3):e0193969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193969. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29534100 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral and environmental influences on fishing rewards and the outcomes of alternative management scenarios for large tropical rivers.J Environ Manage. 2013 Oct 15;128:274-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.037. Epub 2013 Jun 10. J Environ Manage. 2013. PMID: 23764509
-
An overview on the role of Hexanchiformes in marine ecosystems: biology, ecology and conservation status of a primitive order of modern sharks.J Fish Biol. 2012 Apr;80(5):966-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03242.x. J Fish Biol. 2012. PMID: 22497370 Review.
-
Shark recreational fisheries: Status, challenges, and research needs.Ambio. 2017 May;46(4):385-398. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0856-8. Epub 2016 Dec 19. Ambio. 2017. PMID: 27995551 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Dent F, Clarke S. State of the global market for shark products. FAO Fish Aquac Tech Pap. 2015;No 590:187.
-
- Barreto RR, Bornatowski H, Motta FS, Santander-Neto J, Vianna GMS, Lessa R. Rethinking use and trade of pelagic sharks from Brazil. Mar Policy. 2017;85:114–122. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.016. - DOI
-
- Bornatowski H, Braga RR, Vitule JRS. Threats to sharks in a developing country: the need for effective and simple conservation measures. Nat Conserv. 2014;12:11–18. doi: 10.4322/natcon.2014.003. - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources