MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Imaging for Diagnosis of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis - A Critical Appraisal
- PMID: 30255164
- PMCID: PMC6153145
- DOI: 10.1055/a-0647-1575
MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Imaging for Diagnosis of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis - A Critical Appraisal
Abstract
Purpose: It was the aim of our study to evaluate this procedure using pelvic anatomical landmarks in order to assess the accuracy of fusion imaging and to critically evaluate the applicability in daily practice.
Methods: In a prospective, single center study, 10 patients with clinical signs of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) were selected. We measured the distance between the landmark organ and the target shown by the software system (measurement 1). Measurement 2 depicts the distance between the landmark and the nearest calibration point. The calibration inaccuracy was measured as a third type of measurement (measurement 3).
Results: Measurement 1: the average distance between the organ landmark to the target was 13.6 mm (range: 0-96 mm). Measurement 2: in 31 of the 40 attempts (77.5 %), we could measure the distance from the landmark organ to the nearest calibration point. The average distance was 34.4 mm (range: 0-69 mm).Measurement 3: A perfect match was seen in 6 of 20 attempts (30.0 %). There was a deviation in 14 of the 20 attempts (70.0 %). The mean distance was 11.1 mm (range: 6-23 mm). Conclusion Although very promising, MRI-ultrasound fusion imaging (MUFI) currently cannot be readily implemented into daily practice as a routine evaluation of DIE.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
![Fig. 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6153145/bin/10-1055-a-0647-1575-i0145-0001.gif)
![Fig. 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6153145/bin/10-1055-a-0647-1575-i0145-0002.gif)
![Fig. 3](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6153145/bin/10-1055-a-0647-1575-i0145-0003.gif)
Similar articles
-
Fusion imaging for evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: feasibility and preliminary results.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;46(1):109-17. doi: 10.1002/uog.14712. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25358293
-
Sonographic Evaluation for Endometriosis in Routine Pelvic Ultrasound.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Feb;27(2):265-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.027. Epub 2019 Sep 4. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31493569
-
MRI sliding sign: Using MRI to assess rectouterine mobility in pelvic endometriosis.J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Feb;66(1):54-59. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13283. Epub 2021 Jul 9. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34241976
-
Transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;51(5):586-595. doi: 10.1002/uog.18961. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29154402 Review.
-
MRI technique for the preoperative evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: current status and protocol recommendation.Clin Radiol. 2016 Mar;71(3):179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.09.014. Epub 2015 Dec 17. Clin Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26703119 Review.
Cited by
-
Advances in Imaging for Assessing Pelvic Endometriosis.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 26;12(12):2960. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122960. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36552967 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vault Endometriosis: Detailed Step-by-Step Laparoscopic Surgical Management Technique.JSLS. 2021 Oct-Dec;25(4):e2021.00057. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00057. JSLS. 2021. PMID: 34803369 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion technique in gynecology.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;59(2):141-145. doi: 10.1002/uog.24754. Epub 2022 Jan 12. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 34435404 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A short anogenital distance on MRI is a marker of endometriosis.Hum Reprod Open. 2021 Feb 17;2021(1):hoab003. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoab003. eCollection 2021. Hum Reprod Open. 2021. PMID: 33623831 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Johnson N P, Hummelshoj L, Adamson G D, Keckstien J, Taylor H S, Abrao M S, Bush D, Kiesel L, Tamimi R, Scharpe-Timms K L, Rombauts L, Giudice L C. World endometriosis society consensus on the classification of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2017;2:15–324. - PubMed
-
- Chapron D, Fauconnier A, Vierira M, Barakat H, Dousset B, Pansini V, Vacher-Lavenu M C, Dubuisson J B. Anatomical distribution of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: surgical implications and proposition for a classification. Human Reprod. 2003;18:157–161. - PubMed
-
- Bazot M, Daraï E. Sonography and MR imaging for the assessment of deep pelvic endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:178–185. - PubMed
-
- Hudelist G, English J, Thomas A E, Tinelli A, Singer C F, Keckstein J. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for non-invasive diagnosis of bowel endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;3:257–263. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources