Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Jul 30;8(1):11459.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29616-y.

Vitamin K supplementation during pregnancy for improving outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Vitamin K supplementation during pregnancy for improving outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sadequa Shahrook et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

To study supplementation effect of vitamin K (VK) alone or combined with other nutrients administered to pregnant women, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (till 22 January 2016, updated on 28 February 2018) including other resources. Two review authors independently assessed randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials for inclusion, data extraction, accuracy, and risk of bias. We included older trials from high-income countries (six; 21,493 women-newborns), judged mostly as high or unclear bias risk. We could not assess high-risk e.g. epileptic women, but healthy women (different gestational ages) received varying VK dosages and duration. We meta-analysed neonatal bleeding (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.59 to 2.29; P = 0.67) and maternal plasma VK1 (MD 2.46, 95% CI 0.98 to 3.93; P = 0.001). We found many outcomes were un-assessed e.g. perinatal death, maternal bleeding, healthcare utilization. Mostly newborns were included where VK found significantly effective for e.g. serum VK (mother-newborn), maternal breast milk VK. Few trials reported neonatal adverse side effects. The GRADE evidence quality was very low i.e. neonatal bleeding, neonatal jaundice, maternal plasma VK1. The intervention was favourable for maternal sera VK1 but remained uncertain for neonatal bleeding and other outcomes. The existing literature gaps warrant future investigations on un-assessed or inadequately reported outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA study flow identifying potential studies to include in the review on the effect of vitamin K supplementation during pregnancy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias assessment graph on the effect of vitamin K supplementation during pregnancy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall risk of bias assessment on the effect of vitamin K supplementation during pregnancy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison: 1 Vitamin K supplementation compared to no vitamin K or placebo, outcome: 1.1 Neonatal bleeding.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison: 1 Vitamin K supplementation compared to no vitamin K or placebo, outcome: 1.2 Maternal plasma vitamin K.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shils, M. E., Shike, M., Ross, A. C., Caballero, B. & Cousins, R. J. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease 412–412 (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006).
    1. Trumbo P, Yates AA, Schlicker S, Poos M. Dietary reference intakes: vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2001;101:294–301. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00078-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Vitamin and Mineral Requirements in Human Nutrition 108–129 (World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2004).
    1. University of Maryland Medical Center. Internet, http://www.umm.edu/altmed/articles/vitamin-k-000343.htm#ixzz2RAHDe8ZR accessed on November 2013 (2011).
    1. Guelinckx I, Devlieger R, Vansant G. Reproductive outcome after bariatric surgery: a critical review. Human Reproduction Update. 2009;15:189–201. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn057. - DOI - PubMed