Breast cancer screening programs: Review of merits, demerits, and recent recommendations practiced across the world
- PMID: 30023238
- PMCID: PMC6025760
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmau.2016.10.002
Breast cancer screening programs: Review of merits, demerits, and recent recommendations practiced across the world
Abstract
Breast cancer screening is defined as the evaluation of symptom free, otherwise healthy looking females of child bearing age or postmenopausal women for early detection of breast cancer. Screening mammography is the most common and widely practiced breast cancer screening modality across the world. The other modes of breast cancer screening being practiced across the world are: breast self-examination (BSE), clinical breast examination (CBE), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), ultrasonography (USG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and identification of certain genetic oncogenes. The major merits of breast cancer screening programs are: early diagnosis, sorting out and prevention of risk factors, and timely treatment to lessen the morbidity (5 years localized stage survival rate is 99%, regional disease 84% while metastatic breast cancer 5 year survival rate is 23%); it also reduces overall 20% mortality rate. The major demerits of breast cancer screening are: overdiagnosis (19% from the perspective of a woman invited to screening), high cost, ionizing radiation (lifetime attributable risk to develop breast cancer is 3/10,000), false positive biopsy recommendation (about 8/1000), false negative results 11/10,000), and their consequences. Worldwide, most of the countries recommend biennial screening for breast cancer at 50-74 years of age. However, some countries recommend screening mammography earlier, starting at the age of 40 years until 70-74 years based on higher breast cancer incidence rate in those countries. This article provides a detailed review of merits, demerits, and recent recommendations for screening programs being practiced across the world.
Keywords: ionizing radiation; merits; mortality rate; overdiagnosis; screening mammography..
Figures
![Fig. 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6025760/bin/JMAU-5-59-g001.gif)
![Fig. 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6025760/bin/JMAU-5-59-g002.gif)
![Fig. 3](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6025760/bin/JMAU-5-59-g003.gif)
![Fig. 4](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6025760/bin/JMAU-5-59-g004.gif)
![Fig. 5](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6025760/bin/JMAU-5-59-g005.gif)
![Fig. 6](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6025760/bin/JMAU-5-59-g006.gif)
![Fig. 7](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6025760/bin/JMAU-5-59-g007.gif)
![Fig. 8](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6025760/bin/JMAU-5-59-g008.gif)
![Fig. 9](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6025760/bin/JMAU-5-59-g009.gif)
![Fig. 10](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6025760/bin/JMAU-5-59-g010.gif)
![Fig. 11](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6025760/bin/JMAU-5-59-g011.gif)
![Fig. 12](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6025760/bin/JMAU-5-59-g012.gif)
Similar articles
-
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Hologic 3D Mammography Selenia Dimensions System for Use in Breast Cancer Screening: A Single Technology Assessment [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Sep 4. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-08. PMID: 29553669 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.Eur J Cancer. 2018 Feb;90:34-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 20. Eur J Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29272783
-
Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. Report No.: 14-05201-EF-3. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. Report No.: 14-05201-EF-3. PMID: 26866210 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2007;7(1):1-32. Epub 2007 Jan 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2007. PMID: 23074501 Free PMC article.
-
Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1615-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13183. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 26501537 Review.
Cited by
-
Plasma Circulating Terminal Differentiation-Induced Non-Coding RNA Serves as a Biomarker in Breast Cancer.Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2024 Jan 1;18(1):1-6. doi: 10.18502/ijhoscr.v18i1.14739. Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2024. PMID: 38680708 Free PMC article.
-
An audit of breast cancer in patients 40 years and younger in two Johannesburg academic hospitals.SA J Radiol. 2024 Mar 28;28(1):2772. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2772. eCollection 2024. SA J Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38628265 Free PMC article.
-
Unlocking New Avenues in Breast Cancer Treatment: The Synergy of Kinase Inhibitors and Immunotherapy.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 21;15(23):5499. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235499. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38067203 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Can Artificial Intelligence Beat Humans in Detecting Breast Malignancy on Mammograms?Cureus. 2023 Sep 29;15(9):e46208. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46208. eCollection 2023 Sep. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37908910 Free PMC article.
-
A multicentric, single arm, prospective, stratified clinical investigation to evaluate MammoWave's ability in breast lesions detection.PLoS One. 2023 Jul 14;18(7):e0288312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288312. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37450545 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Khairy GA, Guraya SY, Ahmed ME, Ahmed MA. Bilateral breast cancer. Incidence, diagnosis and histological patterns. Saudi Med J. 2005;26:612–5. - PubMed
-
- Guraya SY, Khairy GA. Bilateral synchronous breast cancer. A clinical dilemma. Saudi Med J. 2004;25:2024–5. - PubMed
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization, (WHO). Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. GLOBOCAN. 2012
-
- Bethesda. SEER Stat Fact Sheets Female Breast Cancer. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program National Cancer Institute; April 13. 2015
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources